Caden Posted March 21, 2017 Report Share Posted March 21, 2017 I have a few questions for this topic. Does the new 64-bit arma improve FPS or stabilize it? What kind of graphics settings would be best to run Arma 3 with a GTX 750 ti and an AMD Fx 8350 Eight Core? I usually stay around 30+ on asylum servers (Unless I'm in Kavala) and on the king of the hill servers, I get about 20-30. I just need to know what graphical settings I should use to improve both of them. Currently, I have my settings on low and no shadows. I would like settings that would look good, but at the same time improve my FPS. I've heard you can do stuff in steam startup for the game. Link to comment
Steve Posted March 21, 2017 Report Share Posted March 21, 2017 (edited) Honestly your first problem is that you have an AMD processor. For Arma 3 at least, intel processors allow the game to run much smoother. I've blown most likely over 1500 bucks over the last 5 or 6 years playing Arma 2 OA and then Arma 3. After I learned about 2 years ago that intel processors made a huge difference, I decided that my next PC will have one. Edited March 21, 2017 by Steve Google™ likes this Link to comment
Blake Kingsin Posted March 21, 2017 Report Share Posted March 21, 2017 RIP, you have AMD. I have a 750ti also with an i5 4460 and I get a solid 60 frames on high/very high when server is ~70 players. When it is full I get around 45. Link to comment
Treeherder Posted March 21, 2017 Report Share Posted March 21, 2017 64 bit should reduce stuttering when zooming/entering a city and reduce memory leaks. Little to no noticeable fps increase, just more constant. Play around with your settings. Lower AA, texture, and object detail. The optimize option in the GeForce experience is pretty good. If you're upgrading go for the 6600k and over clock it as high as is safe with your cooling system. Fast ddr4 ram will make a big difference. Lowering object render distance will increase your fps further. Link to comment
Buckwalter Posted March 21, 2017 Report Share Posted March 21, 2017 Turn off all post processing effects (Bloom, depth of field etc), turn off Picture in picture, look up a guide for changing performance parameters in Arma3.cfg and mess with the GPU maxFramesAhead and what not. BlackShot likes this Link to comment
Twinkie Posted March 21, 2017 Report Share Posted March 21, 2017 Also try making your Arma 3 client and BE client high or realtime in priorities. When Im having problems with getting timed out for signatuer files for steam, I also make steam client and bootstraper high. Link to comment
Manolo Posted March 22, 2017 Report Share Posted March 22, 2017 2 hours ago, Caden said: I have a few questions for this topic. Does the new 64-bit arma improve FPS or stabilize it? What kind of graphics settings would be best to run Arma 3 with a GTX 750 ti and an AMD Fx 8350 Eight Core? I usually stay around 30+ on asylum servers (Unless I'm in Kavala) and on the king of the hill servers, I get about 20-30. I just need to know what graphical settings I should use to improve both of them. Currently, I have my settings on low and no shadows. I would like settings that would look good, but at the same time improve my FPS. I've heard you can do stuff in steam startup for the game. Get the new Razen AMD series of CPU and fucking destroy this game! This game is very CPU intensive but having a GPU that's so many generations behind does not help. Try lowering the settings and maybe run in a lower resolution then 1080P. With the New Razen series or a 7700K you can easily get 90-100 Frames even in Kavala with a decent GPU. Link to comment
Caden Posted March 22, 2017 Author Report Share Posted March 22, 2017 Originally, I had a GT 720 and an AMD FX 4130. Then I upgraded to my current setup. My motherboard, unfortunately, doesn't support Intel. Link to comment
Scott Posted March 22, 2017 Report Share Posted March 22, 2017 @Nightfury Nightfury likes this Link to comment
Treeherder Posted March 22, 2017 Report Share Posted March 22, 2017 1 hour ago, Manolo said: Get the new Razen AMD series of CPU and fucking destroy this game! This game is very CPU intensive but having a GPU that's so many generations behind does not help. Try lowering the settings and maybe run in a lower resolution then 1080P. With the New Razen series or a 7700K you can easily get 90-100 Frames even in Kavala with a decent GPU. Link to comment
Nightfury Posted March 22, 2017 Report Share Posted March 22, 2017 change avatar pls thvm Link to comment
wollie35 Posted April 18, 2017 Report Share Posted April 18, 2017 On 22-3-2017 at 1:30 AM, Manolo said: Get the new Razen AMD series of CPU and fucking destroy this game! This game is very CPU intensive but having a GPU that's so many generations behind does not help. Try lowering the settings and maybe run in a lower resolution then 1080P. With the New Razen series or a 7700K you can easily get 90-100 Frames even in Kavala with a decent GPU. It's the Ryzen AMD series (XD), and I can confirm with a ryzen 1700x and a gtx 1080, never had a framedrop or memleak. This ryzen processor is performing better then the I-6900k single and multithreaded wise Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now