Norwegianviking Posted August 14, 2017 Report Share Posted August 14, 2017 (edited) Just now, The Boss said: Well seems that was a bit of an oversight. Checking quickly, seems I may should still be able to increase the base clock just not the multiplier You're not overclocking then. You can do the same thing with a none K. Either get an unlocked CPU with a Z170 board or a locked CPU with a B-250 / H-170. Edit: The multiplier can be changed the length that your CPU can turbo bust. Edited August 14, 2017 by Norwegianviking Link to comment
Ferknight Posted August 14, 2017 Report Share Posted August 14, 2017 Just now, The Boss said: Scroll up a few posts. you honestly seem like the type of guy to get hit by a parked car or the type of guy to bite ice cream Link to comment
Norwegianviking Posted August 14, 2017 Report Share Posted August 14, 2017 Just now, The Boss said: Worst case I send it back and buy a z270 If you don't trust me you can go and ask people about the build in https://linustechtips.com/main/ and people will tell you that you cannot overclock with that board Link to comment
The Boss Posted August 14, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 14, 2017 (edited) Just now, Norwegianviking said: If you don't trust me you can go and ask people about the build in https://linustechtips.com/main/ and people will tell you that you cannot overclock with that board I'm not disagreeing with you, I hadn't looked into Mobo's that much as I was more concerned with the CPU socket and didn't even think to check if it was unlocked. It was an oversight on my part. If I don't get the performance I would like I'll just get a new mobo. Thanks for the input! Edited August 14, 2017 by The Boss Link to comment
NotSoNutty Posted August 14, 2017 Report Share Posted August 14, 2017 1 hour ago, Ferknight said: you honestly seem like the type of guy to get hit by a parked car or the type of guy to bite ice cream You are talking too much. James Anderson likes this Link to comment
Manolo Posted August 14, 2017 Report Share Posted August 14, 2017 (edited) The i5 is a poweful CPU but Arma 3 is special and an upgrade to an i7 will give you better FPS and if you record/stream the i5 will struggle. Edited August 14, 2017 by Manolo Link to comment
Guest Posted August 14, 2017 Report Share Posted August 14, 2017 4 hours ago, The Boss said: I know it's mainly CPU, which is why I switched to intel. I don't play arma as much as I used to, but it did play a part in this build. Personally I think that the i7's aren't worth the extra money for the hyper threading but that's my opinion. In anycase. Parts are already ordered so this is what I'm gonna stick with for a while now Thanks for the feedback though! Arma is all about single-core performance For what it's worth. Link to comment
goyney Posted August 14, 2017 Report Share Posted August 14, 2017 Pay the extra and go with an i7. You won't regret it when it comes to Arma. Link to comment
Cheech'nChong Posted August 14, 2017 Report Share Posted August 14, 2017 4 hours ago, Ferknight said: you honestly seem like the type of guy to get hit by a parked car or the type of guy to bite ice cream Such hostility, everything okay at home buddy? explicit likes this Link to comment
Deny Posted August 14, 2017 Report Share Posted August 14, 2017 8 hours ago, James.Anderson said: And overclock your CPU B250 boards don't allow CPU overclocking. Even if they did, they're aimed at lower end processors hence their budget price and budget build quality. 7 hours ago, The Boss said: I saw a good OC for the i5 is around 5GHz so that's what I'm aiming for Again, you can't overclock on B250. Even if you somehow managed, you'd never achieve 5GHz, the board wouldn't be able to cope. 5GHz is also very hot as you have to crank up the voltage, something which a hyper 212 evo wouldn't be able to handle. 7 hours ago, The Boss said: SanDisk - Ultra II 480GB Internal SATA Solid State Drive That is a good SSD, SanDisk are decent. 7 hours ago, Mitch (IFRIT) said: Liquid cooling? Waste of money, can't overclock on B250. 7 hours ago, Scott said: Arma runs mainly off of CPU and I'm pretty sure the i5 will bottleneck the 1080. If you mainly play arma I'd got for an i7 and a 1070 Games largely rely on single core performance. The difference between the same generation i5 and i7 is very small meaning it wouldn't be a worthy upgrade. Doesn't make sense to spend $100 more to maybe get a few percent in performance gains. i7s have hyper threading and are more suited to multi-threaded workloads hence why the i5 still has its place. 7 hours ago, The Boss said: I fail to see how the CPU wouldn't bottleneck the 1080 on a CPU oriented game. An i5 7600K is a very good performer single threaded wise, I can't see many other CPUs being able to outperform this to a reasonable extent. https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html 7 hours ago, The Boss said: ASUS 24" 1920x1080 60Hz Really isn't much point getting a 1080 if you stick with that monitor. A 1060 would suit that more, a 1070 would be decent. 60Hz will only display 60FPS, something which the 1080 at even ultra settings on most games will easily double. Overclocking it will also just be for pretty little numbers on your screen, your monitor can't display it and all you'll be doing is putting more stress on the GPU, heat wise for no apparent reason. The Boss and explicit like this Link to comment
The Boss Posted August 14, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 14, 2017 (edited) 6 hours ago, Deny said: B250 boards don't allow CPU overclocking. Even if they did, they're aimed at lower end processors hence their budget price and budget build quality. Again, you can't overclock on B250. Even if you somehow managed, you'd never achieve 5GHz, the board wouldn't be able to cope. 5GHz is also very hot as you have to crank up the voltage, something which a hyper 212 evo wouldn't be able to handle. That is a good SSD, SanDisk are decent. Waste of money, can't overclock on B250. Games largely rely on single core performance. The difference between the same generation i5 and i7 is very small meaning it wouldn't be a worthy upgrade. Doesn't make sense to spend $100 more to maybe get a few percent in performance gains. i7s have hyper threading and are more suited to multi-threaded workloads hence why the i5 still has its place. An i5 7600K is a very good performer single threaded wise, I can't see many other CPUs being able to outperform this to a reasonable extent. https://www.cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html Really isn't much point getting a 1080 if you stick with that monitor. A 1060 would suit that more, a 1070 would be decent. 60Hz will only display 60FPS, something which the 1080 at even ultra settings on most games will easily double. Overclocking it will also just be for pretty little numbers on your screen, your monitor can't display it and all you'll be doing is putting more stress on the GPU, heat wise for no apparent reason. Already been told that I fucked up with the Mobo, didn't check if it was unlocked. I was going to get a 1060 6gb but the outlet I wanted to buy it from ran out of stock, and the 1080 was only a tad bit more. As I said in a previous post, I fucked up with the mobo... but if I can get the kind of performance I'm looking for I'll keep it... if not I'll order a new one next week. Do appreciate the feedback! Edit: I did a little bit of checking, while it won't be a true OC I should be able to increase the base clock and extend the boost range. Edited August 14, 2017 by The Boss Link to comment
Bob Lee Posted August 14, 2017 Report Share Posted August 14, 2017 (edited) You overclock only one core so no point. your base feq is 3.8Ghz, don't know what you want Edited August 14, 2017 by Bob Lee Link to comment
... Posted August 14, 2017 Report Share Posted August 14, 2017 I can run Arma 3 without any frame drops with a Ryzen 1700x and a GTX 1080. I only have a 1700x due to my multi-tasking. The 1080 is overkill for just Arma 3. For just Arma, the best quad-core you can get will do you best. You should then get a SSD instead of a 1080; A 1070 will serve you fine. Link to comment
The Boss Posted August 15, 2017 Author Report Share Posted August 15, 2017 1 hour ago, Maric said: I can run Arma 3 without any frame drops with a Ryzen 1700x and a GTX 1080. I only have a 1700x due to my multi-tasking. The 1080 is overkill for just Arma 3. For just Arma, the best quad-core you can get will do you best. You should then get a SSD instead of a 1080; A 1070 will serve you fine. I ordered a SanDisk - Ultra II 480GB Internal SATA Solid State Drive. It came today Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now