LILXRECON202 Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 I feel like this would better train the cadets, their still going to be next to a constable at all times who will supervise Bronx likes this Link to comment
Cliff. Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 -1. The issue that I see with this is that Cadets a lot of the time don't know exactly what to add or when it applies. This also causes the problem of Constables not noticing a Cadet mischarging someone (not paying attention, 911 pings, speeding pings, etc.), and that person being processed not knowing that the Cadet is doing something wrong. I can see the logic that you're going for, but I do think it's flawed. Cadets are there to learn under supervision, not to have complete independence in processing. In theory, a Constable should always be present and attentive 100% of the time. Sadly, however, this is not always the case, and a system as you want it would be abused, and lead to IAs that could be avoided with the system that we currently have. Mr. Brown, Lucky, Space and 1 other like this Link to comment
massi Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 weren't you a constable? did you already get demoted lol Link to comment
ColtonB205 Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 This is unnecessary as the constable is the only one who should be adding the charges as they know what is right and wrong. Cadets are officers in training so no they do not need this power added to them. Space, Lucky, Patato and 3 others like this Link to comment
LILXRECON202 Posted November 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 Just now, Cliffsam98 said: -1. The issue that I see with this is that Cadets a lot of the time don't know exactly what to add or when it applies. This also causes the problem of Constables not noticing a Cadet mischarging someone (not paying attention, 911 pings, speeding pings, etc.), and that person being processed not knowing that the Cadet is doing something wrong. I can see the logic that you're going for, but I do think it's flawed. Cadets are there to learn under supervision, not to have complete independence in processing. In theory, a Constable should always be present and attentive 100% of the time. Sadly, however, this is not always the case, and a system as you want it would be abused, and lead to IAs that could be avoided with the system that we currently have. and i agree but to some cadets who know the rules and read the guidebook should be able too also notify the constable first before he charges, or better yet the cadets are only allowed to add charges during the ride along Bronx likes this Link to comment
Cliff. Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 Just now, LILXRECON202 said: and i agree but to some cadets who know the rules and read the guidebook should be able too also notify the constable first before he charges, or better yet the cadets are only allowed to add charges during the ride along Those kinds of Cadets are likely far and few between, so there would be far more issues with this than is really necessary. Link to comment
The Monopoly Man Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 Why yes, I would love some more corrupt cadets Jake, Silver-Spy, Roice and 10 others like this Link to comment
Chewbacca Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 Just now, Cliffsam98 said: -1. The issue that I see with this is that Cadets a lot of the time don't know exactly what to add or when it applies. This also causes the problem of Constables not noticing a Cadet mischarging someone (not paying attention, 911 pings, speeding pings, etc.), and that person being processed not knowing that the Cadet is doing something wrong. I can see the logic that you're going for, but I do think it's flawed. Cadets are there to learn under supervision, not to have complete independence in processing. In theory, a Constable should always be present and attentive 100% of the time. Sadly, however, this is not always the case, and a system as you want it would be abused, and lead to IAs that could be avoided with the system that we currently have. you are wrong. Link to comment
Chewbacca Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 Just now, The Monopoly Man said: Why yes, I would love some more corrupt cadets Yes, but i mean there already is corruption in the APD :/ Link to comment
Patato Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 Just now, LILXRECON202 said: and i agree but to some cadets who know the rules and read the guidebook should be able too also notify the constable first before he charges, And those cadets prove themselves to a SGT via a ride-along and become a constable thus getting the power. The whole point is for them to exhibit the ability to be responsible and THEN get the power. Not the other way around. Link to comment
Scott Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 Constables shouldn't even be able to add charges bum41, Xavier21k, massi and 2 others like this Link to comment
Google™ Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 +1 Let's do this and not fix gang life! Link to comment
LILXRECON202 Posted November 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 damn and liuetenants should check the apd whitelists open interview more often i see like 3 people on their right now Bronx likes this Link to comment
ColtonB205 Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 Just now, LILXRECON202 said: damn and liuetenants should check the apd whitelists open interview more often i see like 3 people on their right now I am hearing someone who can wait another day for an interview. Have seen on some occasions where people will wait multiple hours for chance at an interview. Link to comment
Subaru Posted November 3, 2017 Report Share Posted November 3, 2017 It’s not going to happen. Locked. Twist.ffs, Silver-Spy, Fidel C4str0 and 2 others like this Link to comment
Recommended Posts