Jump to content

/|/|0T4RD

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    904

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by /|/|0T4RD

  2. S2 SRT

    in Denied

    Posted

    1 hour ago, xeL said:

    I think to combat this we make you head of SRT.  I believe you will have the most up to date tools needed to keep this from happening.

    nooo bro they dont want structure in srt remember? no restrictions everyone must be free to do what they want in srt

  3. S2 SRT

    in Denied

    Posted

    4 hours ago, Michael L said:

    because they bullied an LT who went crying - should not be creating more barriers to people who want to play only 1 of the 2....

    damn g youre never getting cpl w that verbage on me 👌

  4. S2 SRT

    in Denied

    Posted

    9 minutes ago, xeL said:

    I'm gonna keep this rather short and sweet.  Due to the idea that s2 SRT is not connected at all with s1 APD, I believe the requirement of having to be in the APD on s1 to join SRT on s2 should be removed.  I believe this will help this faction grow, as most of the s2 population doesn't play s1 and this will allow those players who only play s2 to actually attempt to join SRT instead of being completely cut out from it.  SRT had a lot of numbers today and it was fun to fight them when they have a decent chunk of numbers and actual delay the win of domination, and I believe this is a solution to it.

    You’re sooo jimmy neutron with this shit bruh I can’t fade it.

    Great suggestion for people who want to play but don’t have a gang.

    Now I’m just waiting on the career cops who said S2 SRT isn’t supposed to be controlled by APD to comment here 👀

    lukee and xeL like this

  5. s2 vehicle rule

    in Approved

    Posted

    57 minutes ago, Repto said:

    Motard while most of your snap backs and comments are usually just in some sense telling others to just get good usually, you do have some come backs here and there that are just a joy to read lol. This one for example made me laugh. 😂

    If you read some of their theories and hunches they post about me you would conclude they probably think everything I said is true

  6. Jewelry Alternative Design

    in Denied

    Posted

    55 minutes ago, lukee said:

    No it’s not, the only past design I’ve made where people “fell through the ground” was the shitty oil rig… not anything else so saying “past suggestions” which refers to multiple cases where that’s happened is just retarded, and your fps will only drop if ur pc is fucking shit so unless ur pc is shit don’t worry about it

    well said Luke very articulate and descriptive 👌could not have said it better

  8. s2 vehicle rule

    in Approved

    Posted

    1 minute ago, Polar said:

    Why not exercise the ability to stop inviting cheaters into your gang constantly? Maybe then you wouldn't be perm banned in the first place and be forced to spectate all the doms from discord. We are doing our civil duties in shedding all the ifrits driven by YOUR cheaters!!! My union reps @Michael L and @william will keep practicing our god given rights!!

    Yes, I am personally recruiting and paying them. We have already opened an LLC, completely legal payroll with federal EIN, using a business line of credit with American Express at Business Centurion level. We will be using the account to fund our Lawless meet up later this summer where we will be ban evading and gambling together at the elite level in Las Vegas. This is also sponsored by gamingasylum.net and CEO of Fed. Some of you could also be with an elite team like ours but you are too busy hating. So focused on the cheese you forgot about the trap.

    Repto, lukee, Acending and 1 other like this

  9. s2 vehicle rule

    in Approved

    Posted · Edited by /|/|0T4RD

    57 minutes ago, Austin M said:

    Why make them follow a policy on a sever meant to just fight?

    Why not exercise the limited authority you do have to mitigate the issue? I agree if you are suggesting to let the admins make a rule against it. However, there is no guarantee they will, and if they are, we do not know how long it would take them to decide if or when. Why not just take the limited action available to prevent further grievance of other players in the meantime? We can sit here and debate what ifs forever, but is unproductive if there is no immediate solution.

    lukee likes this

  10. s2 vehicle rule

    in Approved

    Posted · Edited by /|/|0T4RD

    4 hours ago, Michael L said:

    No worries dude just get on civ, buy hatchbacks and carry on doing it anyway. APD policy update extending their "authority" to s2 will solve this issue from ever happening again I am sure

      Hide contents

    the answer you are looking for is server rules update, not APD policy update and relying on the often useless APD staff to not overreach, there is good reason why the "roleplay faction"'s rules don't apply to s2. Let's not kill off another playing opportunity for cops who are already having enough troubles getting numbers on as it is these days?

     

    You are concerned about a ROLEPLAY FACTION playing a role that has NO productive purpose on a server that has NO ROLEPLAY. Not only that, you are suggesting they have no internal rule structure or accountability that's kinda crazy bro js thank god you are not an APD Captain sheeeeeeesh

  11. s2 vehicle rule

    in Approved

    Posted

    10 minutes ago, Repto said:

    True and I do understand these facts about S2 completely as well as the points you make, I wouldnt be against it if the admins tried to make a rule for it though, I only sometimes play dom on Sundays and barely enjoy it personally. I was moving more to the idea where just like on the S1 server it's not really something that can be to easily regulated and its just gonna happen sadly, it sucks right now that it's something that happens incredibly frequently. I'm sure people have always been shedding ifrits on dom though.

     

    I'm glad to see that some cop SoP's may be in the works for the server as its been very overdue but even then I doubt a cop policy will be able to completely out way much when it comes to the servers general separation from a large majority of S1's server rules. More admin regulation/observation would also be great but that is for sure an extra responsibility to expect from them.

    If the same cops that do it on SRT cant do it on SRT anymore because of policy they are all just gonna gang on civ to do it most likely.

    Would it not be reasonable to suggest this could be handled more effectively with multiple avenues of regulation implemented to mitigate the issue from a holistic approach?

  12. s2 vehicle rule

    in Approved

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, xeL said:

    I completely understand where you are coming from, but SRT has a different garage from s1 to s2.  If they lose a vehicle on s2 (which are cheaper than civ vehicles, by the way), it has no affect onto their s1 garage.  Civilian vehicles transfer from one to the other, civilians are being punished by a faction with MULTIPLE safe guards regarding money being lost.  SRT get paid per flag decap, not points earned by the end of the three hours, they have cheaper kits that are paid per death no matter what gear it's the same price every time, and their vehicles are cheaper and s2 locked.

    The idea that a faction with multiple safeguards are going onto an EVENT server and directly attempting to cause players frustration and make them lose out on money by shedding their frits while they are safeguarded multiple ways is not good for the server, or fair (Especially when they are not even participating in the event at that point, they are just there to cause annoyances to other players and make them spend more money).

    The APD has been spoonfed for over two years on Asylum and they will keep crying wolf and getting more. That has been made undeniably clear. Don't waste your energy pointing it out.

  14. s2 vehicle rule

    in Approved

    Posted

    1 hour ago, xeL said:

    make it against the rules to shed ifrits ON S2 DOMINATION - it's becoming a problem because cops are purposefully shedding vehicles on a server where you're MEANT to use them to fight but still do b/c they are hated at home and pay less for everything so no one will do it back to them!  Why is this a thing on an event server where you're meant to fight with armored vehicles? Cops have absolutely no real objective on the server and don't do shit to increase enjoyment on it.  They get on and act like retards, feed kills, and shed frits and that is about it.  If u disagree u have mental issues.  

    Points for this:

    - Most of s2 pop doesn't play s1

    - There needs to be a reward for players participating, if not shut down the server

    - Some players make money, some players lose money, blood money is spent and earned as well, this circulates the economy

    - Players shouldn't be determining what is too much money, especially those who play a faction that pay less for stuff in game.  Leave it to devs to decide and change the economy on s2 if it's too much.

    - It's an event server where armored vehicles are supposed to be used

    - Cops aren't competing for a win like civs are

    - Cops also make money on this event server, while still paying less for gear

     

    Solutions:

    Solution 1) Make cops pay the same amount for frits and gear as us if this stays, they should not be able to spend less to make others spend more

    Solution 2) Make it against the rules for everyone to shed frits

    Solution 3) Make blown up vehicles go back to the garage as this is an event server and armored vehicles are meant to be used

    Solution 4) Make it an SOP for cops to not shed frits, as civs do not do this as they are actually competing for the win

     

    10/10 would support the truth again. Players intentionally grieving others and interfering with the event should be punished. It is against the rules to interfere and grieve admin events, and to interfere with gang fort. The same should apply here.

  15. s2 vehicle rule

    in Approved

    Posted

    2 minutes ago, Jr4life24 said:

    Oh no, the server that gangs use to print money is being hindered by 4 cops shedding ifrits

    its crazy how big of an affect just one player can have on a server isn't it

  23. Police started "Evidence Transport Event" federal event

    in Denied

    Posted · Edited by /|/|0T4RD

    1 hour ago, Lucien said:

    Cops should only lethal in an escort event at least until the truck is sold. If civs are getting tazed and restrained, then someone needs to take them back to hq and get processed, which pulls people off of doing an event, unless they just get left in the middle of a random field which is not fun for anyone.
     

    Cops that have better HQ positioning, and a better economy to respond to the event until its conclusion. Not all civs have to respond to a bank robbery man. You need to encourage civs to do the event, reasonable hard number caps makes people actual want to show up and contest. Additionally - not everyone should have to show up. It should be a voluntary event to participate in, would be aids to get forced to do a cop started federal event.

    See above. Civs need to be encouraged to participate. Knowing they are not going to be facing an invulnerable wall is much more appealing to make them want to attack the convoy. Limiting helicopter use allows civs to better attack the convey by limiting visibility further encouraging them to participate.

    It's not like people are running an undercover operation during a federal event, if a civ wants to fight the cops at this federal event and sees a civ hatch skin without rednames if no one fought yet, they might not know they can shoot. Wouldn't matter if its a redzone for everyone rather than just against cops tho

    Again, no civs are forced to participate. You need to bite the bullet and encourage them to attend.

    Very articulate and all but like my boy @Makosaid.... 🤷‍♂️

×
×
  • Create New...