Xehons Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 I think this short two day period proved that having one less server helped the community as a whole every server was even FULL at one point Innate, OperationSB, TRYHARD and 9 others like this Link to comment
Hanzo/Dirty Scrubz Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 Just now, Xehons said: I think this short two day period proved that having one less server helped the community as a whole every server was even FULL at one point Yeah RIP s2. Innate, Brokers300 and Space like this Link to comment
Brokers300 Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 Innate likes this Link to comment
McMuffin Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 (edited) It's unfair to people who owned things (houses, etc.) on S2... Edited December 4, 2017 by McMuffin Nino Brown and cosenza like this Link to comment
massi Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 Just now, McMuffin said: I think it's unfair to people who owned things (houses, etc.) on S2... no shit McMuffin and Ian Walls like this Link to comment
Guest Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 It will make a reappearance, you won’t lose your stuff. J Lucky, SirSwish, WildFire and 3 others like this Link to comment
Patato Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 Just now, Xehons said: I think this short two day period proved that having one less server helped the community as a whole every server was even FULL at one point Or its almost like people start playing again as we get closer to Christmas holidays. All of the servers were rocking 70+ people on weekends revise and J. Urbanowski like this Link to comment
Action_Jaxon Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 -1 severs keep crashing so bring it back McMuffin, Nino Brown and Patato like this Link to comment
TRYHARD Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 Just now, Patato said: Or its almost like people start playing again as we get closer to Christmas holidays. All of the servers were rocking 70+ people on weekends dead af the other 5 days of the week Link to comment
Patato Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 (edited) Just now, tryhardsqueaker said: dead af the other 5 days of the week They all are until peak hours except one. Spreading out 10 players won't change that Edited December 4, 2017 by Patato J. Urbanowski likes this Link to comment
Alex. Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 (edited) why not take the worst server....(server 4 and 3) and keep 2 and 1 Edited December 4, 2017 by alex lao Space and Vietnamese Farmer like this Link to comment
J Lucky Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 Honestly when you look at the performance of the servers. Server 2 would have done better. Server 4 for is laggy as balls. We were playing on it and everyones screen was showing things/people in different places, but we were all in the same place at the same time talking. Link to comment
... Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 It was all a ruse. S2 is never coming back. RIP houses. Link to comment
Vietnamese Farmer Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 You really think just dropping a server where people have everything, or where certain ranks of the APD reside with absolutely no prep or foresight is a good idea? What if your server was randomly dropped and you lost everything inside of your houses, and not to mention the "True" value of your houses? (countering the market value, what we will be comped if we do not get our houses back.) Asylum would also have a loss of players due to those who no longer would want to play when everything they had was ripped away from them. massi, atomicturtlexp, Bannab1 and 1 other like this Link to comment
skrood Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 a few days ago I tried to get a fight on s4 in the middle of the fight server crashed cuz asylum servers cant hold more than 60 players. Link to comment
The Ivan Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 Just now, S k r o o d ^ said: a few days ago I tried to get a fight on s4 in the middle of the fight server crashed cuz asylum servers cant hold more than 60 players. hummus skrood likes this Link to comment
Maxime Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 Just now, Vietnamese Farmer said: You really think just dropping a server where people have everything, or where certain ranks of the APD reside with absolutely no prep or foresight is a good idea? What if your server was randomly dropped and you lost everything inside of your houses, and not to mention the "True" value of your houses? (countering the market value, what we will be comped if we do not get our houses back.) Asylum would also have a loss of players due to those who no longer would want to play when everything they had was ripped away from them. If a server goes down there will be a prep without a doubt. Certain ranks of the APD wouldn't be left without any prep the Captains would be aware of it and make changes. Sure it sucks from a certain point of view but from another one it's a good thing. You will most likely have the stuff from your house put somewhere for you. For example in the Asylum Exchange inventory I would assume.. For the house part yes that would suck. Mr. Linux likes this Link to comment
Steve Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 (edited) Cap the servers at 80. You can keep all 4 servers up 24/7. Performance will be better, the players will be more spread out between servers. No one loses houses it's a win win imo. I can't see one reason the devs would think otherwise but if they would like to discuss I am more then happy to hear their opinion on why that is a bad idea. Edit:not to sound like I am the one in charge or anything like that. I'm just a player who sees that asylum can not afford to lose any more of its regular players. Edited December 4, 2017 by Steve Kev 23, Xehons, Ian Walls and 1 other like this Link to comment
Patato Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 Just now, Steve said: Cap the servers at 80. You can keep all 4 servers up 24/7. Performance will be better, the players will be more spread out between servers. No one loses houses it's a win win imo. I can't see one reason the devs would think otherwise but if they would like to discuss I am more then happy to hear their opinion on why that is a bad idea. Edit:not to sound like I am the one in charge or anything like that. I'm just a player who sees that asylum can not afford to lose any more of its regular players. Can confirm i had a group of guys who simply couldn't play last night. Link to comment
Alex. Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 4 hours ago, S k r o o d ^ said: a few days ago I tried to get a fight on s4 in the middle of the fight server crashed cuz asylum servers cant hold more than 60 players. its not that it cant hold more then 60 people. its that server 4 is the laggiest server asylum has. Kev 23 and Patato like this Link to comment
Kev 23 Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 2 hours ago, Steve said: Cap the servers at 80. You can keep all 4 servers up 24/7. Performance will be better, the players will be more spread out between servers. No one loses houses it's a win win imo. I can't see one reason the devs would think otherwise but if they would like to discuss I am more then happy to hear their opinion on why that is a bad idea. Edit:not to sound like I am the one in charge or anything like that. I'm just a player who sees that asylum can not afford to lose any more of its regular players. +1 Patato likes this Link to comment
Guwop Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 11 hours ago, Kevingreen23 said: nah fuck 4 loser McMuffin likes this Link to comment
Guwop Posted December 4, 2017 Report Share Posted December 4, 2017 11 hours ago, McMuffin said: It's unfair to people who owned things (houses, etc.) on S2... could comp monetary value of assets. ;/ Link to comment
atomicturtlexp Posted December 5, 2017 Report Share Posted December 5, 2017 47 minutes ago, Lunchables said: could comp monetary value of assets. ;/ Sure, but what about those who have really nicely placed houses that are now gone? Steve likes this Link to comment
Steve Posted December 5, 2017 Report Share Posted December 5, 2017 17 hours ago, Olio said: It will make a reappearance, you won’t lose your stuff. Have the devs at all considered lowering the player cap on each server to say 80? They could bring up all 4 servers. The servers would have better performance and no one loses their houses or has limited access to them. Is this not the all around better choice? Xehons and Kev 23 like this Link to comment
Vietnamese Farmer Posted December 5, 2017 Report Share Posted December 5, 2017 Just now, Steve said: Have the devs at all considered lowering the player cap on each server to say 80? They could bring up all 4 servers. The servers would have better performance and no one loses their houses or has limited access to them. Is this not the all around better choice? seems everyone would much rather just take a fat shit on s2. Although I'm 100% for the 80 cap. Link to comment
LITTLE HANOI Posted December 5, 2017 Report Share Posted December 5, 2017 Well I make my money on server 2 with my sheds and scotch houses and the other servers most of the money making houses and sheds are taken already, So I lose sheds and good scotch houses Link to comment
Guwop Posted December 5, 2017 Report Share Posted December 5, 2017 13 hours ago, atomicturtlexp said: Sure, but what about those who have really nicely placed houses that are now gone? Understandable but i'm sure the admins would compensate well if the server actually stayed down, which it is not. This is only a temporary thing. Link to comment
Recommended Posts