TOS // The State of Asylum

[Mike Stmria]

11 hours ago, Haych said:

With the vest script or not, CSAT armour applies to the whole person. As Bikstok mentioned, you take a extra 7.62 round to the shoulder/thigh, areas that a vest does not matter. Putting CSAT clothing behind a pay wall is literally P2W.

The price of keys is very high for what you get, and you well knew that people will still buy them to gain the slight advantage CSAT clothing gives you, its worked, people are spending a lot of money just for these clothes, but you are milking the community and giving them items they already payed for by buying Arma. This would of not been a issue if the clothing didn't give you a advantage. Another thing that is wrong with this update is the level of custom clothing added. No effort has gone into these custom commoner skins and yet they are still behind a paywall, like seriously? Instead of those 0 effort commoner clothing, it should of been cool custom Ifrit/Orca skins, cool Hatchback SUV skins that you can unlock.

I like the whole loot box idea, it's a cool way of bringing in money, however making people pay for clothing that gives you a advantage is just not right, again a cool feature and thought but damn it was handled poorly like a lot features you add. Majority of people are not buying the crates for its intended purpose (aesthetics) we are buying them because the advantage its going to give us in combat when we do unlock the CSAT clothing and LCH.

If you need any help making custom skins to bring donation rewards back on track without making it P2W and giving people items they've already 'payed' for or simply optimising the current JPG skins so we can all enjoy .PAA skins without the hefty file size, just ask. I'm literally concerned for Asylum at this current point in time and putting items like these behind paywalls is not the way to go.
 

Listen to this man, he knows about the game and likes the community enough to help it. 

[Sheriff Rick Grimes]

I think the system should just be reformed.  It's actually a good system that works well for everybody but we just have to get rid of the pay to win aspects.  I may make a thread later on how it could be more balanced and possibly better.