Joe. Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 With the new "red is dead" system that appears for everyone in a group, everyone in a gang should have tags. There are some players who are in gangs and they don't have any sign of it other than the gang written below their name up close. So from afar if you are checking names before doing something you check all the names and you see there are 4 tagged members so you go in expecting to face 4 players when in reality there are like 6. It's not really a big deal but its a bit annoying. Link to comment
Haych Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 There is already a system in place that automatically gives tags to grouped up people Link to comment
Dork Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 the only problem i have with the red and dead is gang members that thave 2 groups (14 on, 10 in group, 4 in gang group) all names appear red. Link to comment
Reformed epTic Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 1 minute ago, Dork said: the only problem i have with the red and dead is gang members that thave 2 groups (14 on, 10 in group, 4 in gang group) all names appear red. Because your group is still shooting at someone. Don't make me come back to Pygros and put you in the dumpster again. Link to comment
KillZone Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 Some people don't put tags because people take advantage of it. For instance , and I'll just use us for a example, ok only 2. I tags in player list lets go take their turf/cartel/redguls not that I don't agree with you but that's a big reason they like the element of surprises. I wouldn't care either way so I'll give you +1 Link to comment
Dork Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 1 minute ago, epTic said: Because your group is still shooting at someone. Don't make me come back to Pygros and put you in the dumpster again. Stop by lethal mk20c mags you cheeky bastard. Link to comment
Reformed epTic Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 Just now, Dork said: Stop by lethal mk20c mags you cheeky bastard. Never. I have to be able to afford 50 cals some how. Link to comment
KillZone Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 Just now, epTic said: Never. I have to be able to afford 50 cals some how. Wtf eptic I thought you full cop man, you let me down I looked up to you Link to comment
Reformed epTic Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 Just now, KillZone said: Wtf eptic I thought you full cop man, you let me down I looked up to you I pull out 50s on civ and go sit at a bank and wait for someone to rob it. Link to comment
KillZone Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 2 minutes ago, epTic said: I pull out 50s on civ and go sit at a bank and wait for someone to rob it. Ahh like batman, I like it Link to comment
Reformed epTic Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 Just now, KillZone said: Ahh like batman, I like it Sometimes I camp rebel with suicide vests waiting for those pesky orcas to spawn in. Link to comment
Joe. Posted June 30, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 3 hours ago, Haych said: There is already a system in place that automatically gives tags to grouped up people The only problem with that system is it sometimes glitches putting other people in your group sometimes putting tags of another group etc. and with these server crashes all the time people aren't going straight back into the groups when they return. Link to comment
Shane McCoy Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 4 minutes ago, [IGB] Joe said: The only problem with that system is it sometimes glitches putting other people in your group sometimes putting tags of another group etc. and with these server crashes all the time people aren't going straight back into the groups when they return. True, 50% of the time my gang members have different tags Link to comment
Dork Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 (edited) 24 minutes ago, epTic said: Never. I have to be able to afford 50 cals some how. right in the feels Even though Spek had a gun above his rank and improperly seized it. I got another one seized this morning XD Edited June 30, 2016 by Dork Link to comment
Reformed epTic Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 6 minutes ago, Dork said: right in the feels Even though Spek had a gun above his rank and improperly seized it. I got another one seized this morning XD Spek is a LT tho. What gun is above LT? Link to comment
Dork Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 (edited) 1 minute ago, epTic said: Spek is a LT tho. What gun is above LT? Not according to some admins who will not be named you and i both know that he wasnt using an MXM "Spek is not a Lt anymore he's a corporal as you can see by his name when he shoots you with a MXM" Edited June 30, 2016 by Dork Link to comment
Reformed epTic Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 Just now, Dork said: Not according to some admins who will not be named "Spek is not a Lt anymore he's a corporal as you can see by his name when he shoots you with a MXM" Still has Lt tags in Teamspeak o.o Link to comment
Dork Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 1 minute ago, epTic said: Still has Lt tags in Teamspeak o.o Corporal that can use an mk-1 o_O? Link to comment
Reformed epTic Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 Just now, Dork said: Corporal that can use an mk-1 o_O? Don't undercovers have access to MK-1s? Link to comment
Iced Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 5 minutes ago, epTic said: Don't undercovers have access to MK-1s? Should they tho? Link to comment
Reformed epTic Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 Just now, Iced said: Should they tho? Wouldn't be a very good undercover if they had an MXM. Link to comment
Iced Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 Just now, epTic said: Wouldn't be a very good undercover if they had an MXM. agreed but there are other guns available just seems like a meh loophole Link to comment
Cassettes Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 What's the point of tags if they are red? You'll notice that they're red before you notice their tags. Reavantos likes this Link to comment
Joe. Posted June 30, 2016 Author Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 4 hours ago, Cassettes said: What's the point of tags if they are red? You'll notice that they're red before you notice their tags. Before I decide to try and 1v4 a group I try to find all of their members and once I start shooting the untagged guys go red and kill me Link to comment
Google™ Posted June 30, 2016 Report Share Posted June 30, 2016 Fuck no -1 We should have the freedom to make decisions on if we should put tags on or not. Link to comment
Recommended Posts