Scipio Lost

I have seen that S1 and S4 now have the capacity to hold 110 players...but why? They both constantly crash, lag out, or get DDoSed. It has come to my attention that S3 and S2 will only see the light of day on the weekends. If you are going to have two servers will a high player capacity, atleast let those who have houses on S3 and S2 sell them so that they don't have to wait to use the things they own. Honestly, I think there needs to be more interaction with the community..as I see slim to none. Another thing that needs to be addressed is gangs. Everyone left for olympus, and there are no more good gangs to fight with or against...maybe some new features for gangs will bring some of the good players back? 
Edit: I found much need to edit my post. As soon as I get on S4, there is a mass battleye kick. This shows how bad of a provider Asylum has. Why doesn't olympus have these issues? I can get on any of their servers and have no issues. S1 and S4 are crashing so much that they are unplayable. No wonder why everyone left for olympus. I just don't get how you can think that making the two laggiest servers be able to hold more players would solve any issue..because it doesn't. If other providers are too expensive, then how about listening to your community for a change? Maybe implement some of the ideas that the community wants instead of playing PUBG all day. That may give people a reason to donate to your servers, because where we are right now, there isn't. If you agree, please say something.
Update:
So now, after two days of this, Asylum is now on it's last straw. Server 4 is repeatedly crashing. As for Server 1, I fear the same. Server 2 and 3 have to manually be put to due to a flaw in the scripts (as far as I know) . If something does not happen soon, I fear the fall of asylum. All 4 servers were full until this dumbass update came into play. Maybe, just maybe, the developers will take a break from PUBG for a few hours and fix this shit. And do not expect Identity to ever come out...if they can't maintain 4 servers on ArmA, they surely won't be able to maintain a full game. 
(and also, no personal attack to any devs is meant)

Not at all. S3 has always run the best

As soon as S3 goes up, more than half of S4's pop goes to S3...it is the best running server, why not leave it up instead of S4?

server pop increased to 110 but any time the server gets to 70+ people it has issues...

Very well put, John. I agree. I put all of my time on Asylum into S3 just to have it not see the light of day until the weekend. Same with another friend of mine.

Yeah I have all my old shit on s4 but all my recent shit on s3 same with my scotch houses so when they take it down I have no scotch to sell which = No $ which = no playing asylum 
which =equals asylum Dieing if enough people don't play.

Seriously, some people have all of their resources and gear on servers 2 and 3 and with no warning, they just shit on them. 

why would u do that

@Gnashes @Paratus @bamf 

Server 3 and 1 future mains plz

Not a money related issue, servers are paid monthly whether in use or not. Wouldn't waste your time complaining on the forums, quite obvious the devs aren't listening. Timely updates and new content would fix all the issues with asylum but devs can't be bothered. They take the easy route and kill 2 servers so they don't have to do anything

while this does seem like a cool way to get shit govs out of office i think its just not possible. if you dont like the tax rate, try to get gov next time. it would be unfair because if you dont like who is in gov then you'd just start a revolution every time they got into office.

i respect that you try to recommend something but you should just give up. Nothing recommended gets added and all people will do is shit on you for it.