You obviously did not read my comment. I said Hillary Clinton is perhaps the most qualified person to run for president in recent history. I did not address the claims for her recent scandals. Living in the white house, being a U.S senator of one of the most populous states, and secretary of state is quite an impressive resume.
As for the scandals you speak of, Clinton has taken responsibility for Benghazi but the blame lies on the Pentagon, Defense Department, and State Department (which she was head of). In 2011, the House of Representatives cut funding for embassy security by $128 million, and another $331 million in 2012. Obama requested more security funding at that time and was denied. At the time, this "embassy" was not such and was a mere outpost, which had 3 guards and 2 others who accompanied Stevens. 5 vs.125 doesn't seem like a fair fight to an underfunded State and Defense Dept. Amidst all this Clinton still took responsibility for the attack (rightfully). Unfortunately she has become the scapegoat for this tragedy due to Republican politics. We also have Republican Congressman Richard Hannah's comment, “This may not be politically correct, but I think that there was a big part of this investigation that was designed to go after people and an individual, Hillary Clinton.”
I'm not sure what you know about Hillary that I don't. I am well aware of her flaws with decision-making and frankly, her bland personality. However, you speak of her "streak of disasters" but fail to mention Donald's. I'm sure you are aware of the video with him bragging about sexually assaulting women. I've been in many locker rooms from my time as an athlete and this is just simply not "locker room talk" as he claims. What about that time he made fun of a disabled reporter? The birther controversy? Claimed global warming was created by China and then when confronted about it on national television, simply lied?
I hate to create such a partisan reply to what you said, but frankly, I feel you are failing to see both sides of the argument. While all this ^^^^ might be biased. What is not biased is that Trump has quite a low probability of winning.The way this election has shaped out, Trump needs to win Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania, and most likely Arizona. He will probably win Arizona and likely Ohio. Florida seems an off chance and Pennsylvania is nearly impossible, especially with the recent release of his comments about women. Despite this Trump has a chance of winning. He has a solid base of voters who will not leave him no matter what he says. As a result, he must venture out into mainstream America to capture those undecided voters. This has been his biggest flaw. Instead of garnering new votes, he has reinforced the votes that he's already won! He has won the trade vote, the anti-clinton's, hardcore republicans, etc. He needs to prove to America in the next 20+ days that he has the temperament to be present. Difficult but not impossible.
