BishopActual

I used to run wired headphones but I honestly prefer the mobility and comfort. Same response here, I know they aren't always as good as wired but there's advantages to using them and they honestly outweigh the disadvantages. That's a $300 wired headset. Feels bad man. Fuck you Maric, I'm poor. meh

As I was getting off of my computer for the evening, I heard an awful snap from my Razer Man o' Wars, the arm that holds them together is snapped clean apart. So, in my bed I sadly research a new headset, but fuck those wired ones. Any suggestions? I'm looking at the Steelseries Arctis Pro's. Not getting another set of Razer anything. Game I'm mostly worried about is Rainbow Six Siege, need the best fidelity and responsiveness I can get. Probably going to pass out soon so if I don't respond, y'know. Edit: Arctis Pro + GameDAC seems great, but also seems like $250.

wat

you earned that like

i'm the real bishop

???????? losing braincells as i type this

Prime @Tiger in this montage. didn't know they were back

I haven't gotten feedback on the HQ I built and it's 100x less important than prison. I don't feel like I'm willing to put in effort if I'm not going to get any official thoughts on the first thing I suggested.

I can build stuff that isn't garbage. I just need to actually have the opportunity to build something and have it be implemented. Without that shot it's like working for no paycheck, what's the point?

Siege is why I bought my 144hz monitors, it's a huge change. One thing to know is that to use 144hz effectively at 1080p or higher, you need a Display Port cable, or a Dual-Link (don't know the full name of it.) I was furious when I got my 144hz monitor and then couldn't use it at 144hz until I got a display port cable. https://www.amazon.com/Cable-Matters-Gold-Plated-DisplayPort/dp/B005H3Q59U You can find cheaper ones on Amazon but those are the ones I use.

With regards to what Henry was saying, OLED is a newer type of monitor that has much true-er colors, it's an Organic Light Emitting Device, so instead of having a black backlight, if something is black, the actual pixel is off, instead of being backlit. OLED is a huge difference, but if it's not something you know you want, I'd say to just go with a nice 144hz monitor. Edit: https://www.amazon.com/Viotek-GN32C-Widescreen-Definition-DisplayPort/dp/B01N2QN4YP The main monitor of my setup, the curve is a nice addition and it's a great monitor.

Rework areas on the map to give people something fresh to see.

I'll see if I can work on something, might clean up the prison a bit too.

???????????????????????????

y e e t https://gyazo.com/863887629f9893c58bfe436b5d95387c and https://gyazo.com/7873ac57d0647753acb501e4cf6e5e61

Yung Gravy is what happens when you drop out of an Ivy League college to pick up rapping.

Is this genuinely the best thing you have to do with your day? You shadowplay someone that whiffed a mag and then upload that shit and then post about it on the forums? @Shmeatyy God, rebels depress me more and more each day we stray further from the light of Prime.

glhf

Honestly, I don't think he'd like what he came back to. I think unbanning him would be too little too late for the boy.

My complaint about Mr. Clockwerk Friends, I cannot state more clearly the following sobering fact: Mr. Clockwerk masterminded last year's now-infamous attempt to welsh on all sorts of agreements. Before I launch into my main topic, I want to make a few matters crystal-clear: (1) His mephitic indiscretions militate against our survival by operating in the gray area between legitimate activity and possession-obsessed miserabilism, and (2) as a result of that, he is simply incapable of entertaining an unorthodox idea. Now that you know where I stand on those issues, I can safely say that if you were to tell him that he does not believe in free speech for those who hold opposing points of view, he'd just pull his security blanket a little tighter around himself and refuse to come out and deal with the real world. I'm going to stick out my neck here and make the bold statement that Clockwerk's most recent ethics are irreverent, in bad taste, and inappropriate. That's the theory, at least. But in practice, the simplicity and prejudice of Clockwerk's worldview, that the eradication of his opponents would restore mankind's golden age and save humanity from ruination, leads Clockwerk to encourage a deadly acceptance of intolerance. He may mean well, but I often see acerbic, Pecksniffian twerps damming the flow of effective communication. Should we blame white privilege, hegemonic masculinity, heteronormativity, and internalized oppression? No, we should blame Clockwerk because Clockwerk has inadvertently provided us with an instructive example that I find useful in illustrating certain ideas. By making our lives miserable, Clockwerk makes it clear that his foolhardy sottises befuddle the public and make sin seem like merely a sophisticated fashion. News of this deviousness must spread like wildfire if we are ever to unmask his true face and intentions in regard to Tartuffism. A more fundamental problem is that inasmuch as I disagree with Clockwerk's accusations and find his ad hominem attacks offensive, I am happy to meet Clockwerk's speech with more speech and, if necessary, continue this discussion until the truth shines. Clockwerk's faithfuls have been running around recently trying to attack the very fabric of this nation. Meanwhile, Clockwerk has been preparing to feed us a diet of robbery, murder, violence, and all other manner of trials and tribulations. The whole episode smacks of a carefully orchestrated operation. If you ask me, those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Of course, if Clockwerk had learned anything from history, he'd know that I am more than merely surprised by his willingness to use cheap, intemperate propaganda to arouse the passions of costive loons. I'm shocked, shocked. And, as if that weren't enough, from secret-handshake societies meeting at “the usual place” to back-door admissions committees, Clockwerk's helpers have always found a way to take control of a nation and suck it dry. I like to face facts. I like to look reality right in the eye and not pretend it's something else. And the reality of our present situation is this: Clockwerk thinks that he can make me experience psychological stress or “cognitive dissonance” if he can open the floodgates of extremism. This is worth noting because we must bear this bitter truth coolly and soberly in mind. I won't dwell on that except to direct your attention to the humorless manner in which he has been trying to hornswoggle people into voting against their own self interests. At this point in the letter I had planned to tell you that instead of pumping up the volume, we should spend a little more time listening to each other and trying to focus on how we can expand people's understanding of Clockwerk's jaundiced, abysmal barbs. However, one of my colleagues pointed out that he is a card-carrying member of the Hypocrisy Club. Hence, I discarded the discourse I had previously prepared and substituted the following discussion in which I argue that it's debatable whether our national consciousness still bears the stain and the scars of letting Clockwerk step on other people's toes. However, no one can disagree that I've heard Clockwerk say that he could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else. Was that just a slip of the lip, or is Clockwerk secretly trying to trample into the mud all that is fine and noble and beautiful? Let me give you a hint: I, for one, sincerely dislike him. Likes or dislikes, however, are irrelevant to observed facts, such as that we can't stop Clockwerk overnight. It takes time, patience and experience to protect our peace, privacy, and safety. What can I do to prove to you that featherbrained, crime-stained fefnicutes don't think like you and me? Show you evidence that his views represent not only a denial of reality, but also an especially stinking sort of spiritual poison that will displace meaningful discussion of an issue's merit or demerit with hunch and emotion quicker than you can double-check the spelling of “electrotelethermometer”? While that would unmistakably help, Clockwerk's brethren are quick to point out that because Clockwerk is hated, persecuted, and repeatedly laughed at, he is the real victim here. The truth is that, if anything, Clockwerk is a victim of his own success—a success that enables Clockwerk to promote the lie of sensationalism. I may be beating a dead horse here, but I do want to point out that he should show some class. Still, this is all light opera amid the shrill insanity of Clockwerk's inattentive litanies. I was once asked, “What meaningless self-inflicted psychological trauma is Clockwerk going through now?”. I'm not quite sure how to answer such a question. The problem is that Clockwerk insists that only one or two members of his entire klatch of immoral flapadoshas are voluble scrubs. Only one or two members? This is, to put it charitably, an understatement of the facts. It would be far more accurate to say that Clockwerk's confederates' thinking is fenced in by many constraints. Their minds are not free because they dare not be. I haven't yet found a reliable poll, but public sentiment is clearly overwhelmingly against Clockwerk. Most likely, this is because he relies heavily on “useful idiots”, that is, people who unwittingly do his dirty work for him. Without his swarms of useful idiots, Clockwerk would not have been able to conceal the fact that he claims that society will benefit if he goes ahead with his plan to suppress controversy and debate. That's like pulling up a plant to see how the roots are doing. It also proves that Clockwerk is oblivious to the fact that he claims to have data supporting his assertion that sectarianism is the key to world peace. Naturally, he insists that he can't actually show us that data—for some unspecified reason, of course. My guess is that he's hiding something. Maybe he's hiding the fact that he has a reckoning coming—and Clockwerk knows it. I was once screamed at by a complete stranger who insisted that our only chance of saving the planet is to accept unending regulations and straightjacket “reforms” from Clockwerk's famuli. That's one sure tip-off to the fact that you're being assaulted by one of Clockwerk's devotees: the incredible amount of bombast; the heroic, utopian grandiloquence; the boastfulness; and the complete lack of reality. I find it depressing that so many fastuous prigs buy that sort of thing. Perhaps it's because they're unaware that Clockwerk commonly appoints ineffective people to important positions. He then ensures that these people stay in those positions because that makes it easy for Clockwerk to leave a large part of this country's workforce dislocated and disillusioned. When you get right down to it, I fully intend to fight for economic, social, and cultural justice. When people ask me, “What can I do to help?”, I always suggest that they subject his editorials to the rigorous scrutiny they warrant. Such actions are moral in the true sense of the word. Furthermore, they help people see that several things Clockwerk has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of his that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how he and his swampers should ultimately decide what opinions are acceptable or unacceptable. While China has their Great Wall of China, we should erect a Great Wall of refuting Clockwerk's arguments line-by-line and claim-by-claim. Of course, that's just a figurative way of saying that I must part company with many of my peers when it comes to understanding why Clockwerk functions not as a social critic but as an unoriginal imitator of the ruling ideologues. My peers aver that the core of this seemingly insoluble problem is the fact that the surest way for Clockwerk's hirelings to succeed is for them to accelerate our descent into the cesspool of defeatism. While this is truly true, I contend we must add that if you were to ask Clockwerk, he'd say that he doesn't remember condoning universal oppression. Not only does Clockwerk definitely have a very selective memory, but despite the dominant narrative within his flock that anyone who dares to acquire the input of a representative cross-section of the community in a non-threatening, inclusive environment can expect to suffer hair loss and tooth decay as a result, history tells a different story. History tells us that Clockwerk might foster Comstockism at every opportunity some day. What are we to do then? Place blinders over our eyes and hope we don't see the horrible outcome? Clockwerk's methods of interpretation are geared toward the continuation of social stratification under the rubric of “tradition”. Funny, that was the same term that his eulogists once used to panic irrationally and overreact completely. Clockwerk's impractical, wild convictions echo the darkest chapters of persecution. That's something you won't find in your local newspaper because it's the news that just doesn't fit. In light of what I just stated, it's hard to avoid the conclusion that I recently heard Clockwerk tell a bunch of people that mediocrity and normalcy are ideal virtues. I can't adequately describe my first reaction to this notion; I simply don't know how to represent uncontrollable laughter in text. If we intend to defend democracy, we had best learn to recognize its primary enemy and not be afraid to stand up and call him by name. That name is Mr. Clockwerk.

There's been countless trainings on the subject. If they want to continue to shoot like apes, let them.

if i had a thumbs down option i would pay for bots for the sole purpose of giving you eternally negative reputation

that's on the cartel

o7 Monopoly.

@Chungo rip