Sail

The jews didn't need guns to feel free. wait, shit. Man, you're missing the point of the 2A. Let me try to make this simple for you. Look, by taking away guns, you are only promoting the eventual happening of the issue. Which is a tyrannical state, if you take away the very thing that allows citizens to have a fighting chance against government tyranny, tyranny is more likely to happen. The modern era doesn't change that, government will never be and should never something the American People ought to rely on. Look at how much shit has happened in Europe over the past 300 years. Europe is the perfect example of why guns are important. If any leader of any country in europe were to one day decide to say "fuck it, I want this land over here" hundreds, if not thousands of civilians would die in that country due to lack of protection. Same in japan, same elsewhere. Most inner-cities in america, which have strict gun-laws, still have obscene crime problems. You see, it doesn't matter if you ban guns, crime will exist. Unbelievable acts of evil will still continue to happen, it is the ugly truth of the matter and banning guns is not the solution. You are only beating around the bush when it comes to beating guns. We ought to focus on something more valuable to humanity such as mental health rather than the tools evil people use to commit unspeakable acts of terror. How about we focus on the mental stability of people, so they dont do these horrific things, rather than banning all the tools which law abiding citizens regularly use to feed, defend, and enjoy themselves with.

You act as if taking away guns stops people from committing crime? What? Japan is a police state, the government heavily regulates EVERYTHING. The government in japan has been known to lay tyranny upon its people multiple times throughout history. It is a perfect example of why our freedoms are so important. The purpose of the second amendment in America is to protect the people against a tyrannical state (Read "The Rights of Man"). It is not only for self defense from people who threaten us, but also from the government who attempts to take away the tools we use to protect ourselves.

Fuck it, take my guns, I guess I will nicely ask the burglar to stop next time he tries to rob my shit.

I prefer my criminals armed with 2 shots in the chest and 1 in the head. Why, because I don't want them to even fuck with me. If they come into my house with a knive, spoon, fork, toothpick, i will shoot them.

The people you support do, comrade.

I mean, have you seen England's and australia's violent crime rate? It isn't pretty. Criminals don't magically become non-criminals when they dont have a gun. They'll still commit violent crime with or without one. But by no means should the solution be taking away the guns that people use to defend themselves from these people. Including guns such as the AR-15/Ak-47. Here is an example of their practical use of self defense. https://www.ammoland.com/2019/02/houston-gunfight-as-deadly-as-ok-corral-home-owner-uses-ak47-in-self-defense/#axzz5zQN0fOHa Also, dont call me a fascist because you can't debate me comrade Randall.

How about you win an argument before you go to the forums? Good luck taking my guns when you're too afraid to hold one.

Welcome gamer, we better.

BeNgALs GoINg AlL ThE waY

hi sosa! my day is good!

College Student. Economics/Pre-law

Increase the price of being a bounty hunter (license).

This is a yikes.

This is some quality roleplay. Really liked the part when he said "and fuck your dog" Someone find this man the "hurt feelings report" form.

You think your other chargers even matter if its a straight to jail charge? Straight to jail means straight to jail. Not Straight to jail after reading all of your charges. I'd only identify the charge that makes you eligible to go to prison.

1. There are various other reasons to send someone in jail during combat, such as not wanting you in combat. 2. You're assuming they're money hungry 3. You're at a police facility, a prison, where there are various amount of resources available (in a real life sense) such as jail cells, security, and more. Of course they should be able to send you to prison inside, you know, a Prison. The Bank is a completely different scenario where a lot of RP can be had.

You're missing your own point. Which is: " I don't want to be sent to prison for the charge." None of the other straight to jail charges say "Straight to jail, except when X, Y, and Z." Sorry dude, its Straight to Jail, not Straight to jail AFTER combat.

Then dont do the prison. This issue has been addressed multiple times. Maybe its time to rethink the skill live required to do a prison successfully. Maybe Banks and Feds are more suited for your type of play style. Prison may be the "endgame" of asylum.

I don't get it. You guys start prisons with the goal of killing the same cop over 10 times (in most prisons) and to break out your friend. And complain after you overstay your visit and get caught. I don't like the fact that you guys have to be sent straight to prison, but you clearly go in there knowing what the risks are. So don't complain about the consequences when you already knew you would be facing them in the first place. Now my only idea would be for the officer to be required to give you a full, or half ticket (depending on if you came many minutes after the prison was over) before sending you. Most of the time, at least for me, I dont send those people to prison. So, dont be toxic and maybe they'll process you.

William after reading this comment ^.

I do, you just never let me play with you

Are you guys fucking high?

You wouldn’t understand, like always.