BlackShot

From what I could notice, these are the main issues and they can all be addressed: BOUNTY HUNTERS ARE TOO OVERPOWERED - Restrict 5.56 rifles access to skip tracer and increase their prices. - Increase price of Hunter and/or let it be unlocked via BH honor tree only. - Reconsider pilot coveralls. BOUNTY HUNTERS SEND EVERYONE TO JAIL - Increase minimum bounty price to something between 15-25k. That wouldn't punish self-defense cases and allows time to pay off bounties (courthouse or cop ticket). BOUNTY HUNTERS ARE CONSTANTLY DOWNING AND LEAVING PEOPLE RESTRAINED - Increase BH license price by at least 200-300% (but perhaps don't make it so rebel license replaces it, just add a cooldown on switching them). - Cops are *required* to seize Bounty Hunters licenses if: they kidnap cops or civs OR they down a civ who doesn't have a bounty, isn't armed and charge is prested. (Cop vs. BH policy could be better discussed. Just some ideas to make it less worth for Bounty Hunters to abuse their powers.)

Very @Mitch (IFRIT) behavior.

I'm really sorry about your loss. Welcome back!

That laugh at the end.

Looks like that.

It seems they've been developing the game for 2 years already (with a small team), and would need about 6~12 months to release early access if they reach their monetary goal.

Interesting. Looks like they've been developing the game for 2 years already (with a small team), and would need about 6~12 months to release early access if they reach their monetary goal to expand their crew.

See if you have any luck by downloading and installing their official software. Just click here to download or here to see their page.

What's your keyboard's brand and model?

Houses have been a bit buggy lately. It's something that will be rewritten for Asylum V2. However, if you lost any items which you'd like to reclaim, just submit a request here.

What exactly are you talking about?

Olá!

Hello again!

Finally a post worth clicking!

I highly doubt we were chosen only because we speak different languages. I added a whole lot of different information on my application when I first applied; speaking another language is just a bonus. Also, for the second part of your sentence:

It is and it'll always be an English-speaking server. However, that doesn't change the fact that Asylum has always had a considerable flow of foreign players. Those players usually know enough English to play here but not enough to handle compensation, rules, general questions, appeals etc. We hope to be the bridge between them and the staff when needed.

Seems like you were using a different version of JSRS, different than the one used and accepted by Asylum. Just click Henry's link and you should be fine.

That isn't a forum problem, mate. Sorry to tell you.

I'm sorry, Steve. I tend to agree to most of the ideas you write here on the forums, but this isn't one of them, and this specific comment of yours shows me a tremendous level of selfishness and lack of empathy, and I seriously doubt we'd achieve any good outcome after acknowledging this fact. I don't mean to be rude, but I'll probably stop replying here, I'm sorry. It's just that, to me, depression and other serious illness discussions usually depend on a minimum amount of empathy and such. I respect your opinion though. And so is true for many other health issues. But we don't give up on people because there's a "natural selection" way of solving things. We - in general terms - fight for them, search for cures/treatments and support people the way we can. There's a lot of brilliant minds that go through unexpected and serious diseases that would be a tremendous loss for the world or for their local communities. Many of them have a lot to give back, way more than worrying about how much it'll cost government to help them.

I don't think the definition of natural selection is the problem here. Your logic of applying natural selection to depression or AIDS is something that isn't done ever since that point in history where science and medicine were able to cure or treat most illness without having to let people die. I bet you and everyone else around here wouldn't be alive today if it wasn't by this fact. And even if your concept of natural selection were true for depression and AIDS, it would also be true for many other diseases, including cancer.

The problem about depression is that it's a disease just like any other. It's a chemical disorder that takes place in the brain and is triggered by social or major events of life. When it gets too strong to the point you aren't able to cope with your mental pain, you see death as the last resort to escape such painful reality. There are many types of treatment and it depends on each individual case. Some might be solved with light therapies and some will actually involve drugs - and even this part is hard, since not every drug works for every patient. Not to mention side effects. As I said, it's a disease like any other. Depression has been called "the century's greatest evil" by many authors. One person suicides every 40 seconds because of depression. It's become a matter of public health, which means government shouldn't choose between cancer or depression, Steve. It should support both.

If this were true in our current society, you wouldn't consider seeing a doctor when you got sick. You'd just wait it out to see what natural selection was keeping for you.