Patato

Well, we have a couple thousand active bans for racism. The most recent permanent ban is actually a racism ban. If you see it happening feel free to report where it will be dealt with https://www.gaming-asylum.com/forums/index.php?/support/

You think we can afford her? I've got $20 to throw in

Were going to continue on trying to make it work on S1, 1.) In the long term i think its better to get a higher player count on a consolidated server. Thus attracting new players. 2.) Frankly no one is interested in trying to upkeep and maintain these shitty S2 mods we don't have ownership of/source code for. And no one wants to make them from scratch. 3.) Its never been raised as an issue. But I personally don't expect them to pay for an additional server with the player count how it is. 4.) If its ever going to come back they need to figure out a monetization/donation system that lets it pay for itself. Domination has been freeloading on S1 since its inception

We can't even find people to help maintain Domination. You think development is slow now.... Unless something changes no one on the dev team has the motivation to take on starting a modded server from scratch.

Approved

In need of a Web developer. please submit applications

As for the actual suggestion, I think it just needs alot more detail It leaves me with a lot of questions. What is the purpose of the Govoner if this were to be implemented. Wouldn't this essentially remove the entire role outside of pardoning players? Players are just going to store any gear we give them instead of fight, they already do this when they can get away with it in admin events. Why would players participate in these fights. Most players arn't going to be affected by weed legalization or death penalty. So they would be fighting solely for reduction of taxes. Personally i don't think this is enough incentive leading to lack luster player involvment. Picking factions, Obviously players will want to play with their friends. How do we stop one faction from gaining overwhelming numerical advantage and just steam rolling the other factions. or stopping factions from teaming up? My initial thought was having pre-determined fights between the four citys. Say one week its kavala fighting sofia at the same time as pyrgos fighting athira For this "event" to function i think you need alot more in the way of personal rewards. It also needs to impact the island more. The scenario in my head would be along the lines of Pyrgos faction vs Athira faction. Perhaps pyrgos faction loses and their city falls into chaos. The APD base would be forced to close, but in turn due to the civil unrest the bank would also close and couldn't be robbed. You would also need some sort of mechanic to punish the losing side. Otherwise players will just concede the fight/not participate to get a more advantagous outcome. I think its an interesting concept. But the idea is just not fleshed out enough to really have a conversation amongst devs. It would basically just be me going "How do we have a civil war on asylum"

What a dumb statement S1 Domination event Depositing bonus money directly into your gang account every 5mins for owning a cartel Storage lockers (APD didn't get these) interactive gathering Removing talents I'm also pretty sure the cops would have been just as happy had we not re-added evidence/shipping robbery. APD at any given point can only make up at max 1/3 of the server population. Obviously civilians are important and we want to encourage civ v civ experiences. Its why we basically forbid cops from going to cartels. Its why we have constant random events (Air drops/Ufo/shipping) which cops are dissuaded from attending. The APD are very vocal about wanting to be able to patrol and not sit in federal events all night. The OBVIOUS thing for us to do is to explore ideas (exactly like this one) which encourages civs to fight each other and not cops.

The house always wins

Blackjack in jail but instead of money you're gambling for how long you will be in jail. no max

I get what you're saying. I honestly do. But none of the developers actually have the buttons to do this. Its not a won't or want. Its CANT I would approve this right now and do it if I had the buttons to do it. Unfortunately I have no way of ensuring that even if the section existed that it would be read or used by the people you're trying to reach. The reality is your developers are dedicated to taking in feedback and providing you a response. This is the way we as a development team have agreed to do it. No secret DM conversations. No Developer shopping for features. No confusion (Or at least as little as possible ;3). I could not move it. But it will just sit in the bottom of this forum cluttering it, Our goal as a team is to have you feel heard. 100 forum posts cluttering up our section of the forum asking for changes to things we can't fix isn't fair to us. I already feel bad about some of the suggestions having sat as long as they are. Obviously the community managers don't feel this is an effective way to take in suggestions and have their own method. But i promise you they DO have the button to make an identical forum section just as this one. They choose not to. And with that, I respectfully move this to the section of the forums that is Altis life discussion, i encourage you to discuss why we don't have a suggestion area for Server rules, anything AFD related. and the APD suggestions being mostly ignored. (Granted alot of the things in there are often development suggestions. Turns out APD don't control which gun a constable gets)

Hello, This is unfortunately the development section of the forums. Where you are able to speak with developers about development issues. Rules/Enforcement of rules is not somthing we have any control over. That would be Admins/CM's I have moved your topic to Altis life discussion.

Our web dev has gone missing. Reward for any tips on his location

@Austin Rogers The Original You know what must be done