Jump to content

bbgreg17

Retired APD Captain
  • Posts

    3,092
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by bbgreg17

  1. Just now, AxHa said:

    spoon i'm not talking about my self i'm talking about helping out potatoes like u in a gunfight 

    Why should they add something for people who can not shoot? Learn to shoot straight. Keep in mind this is coming from someone who is very, very far from the best at arma combat. I wouldn't even consider myself good. Why should they add something to make me more of a walking tank just cause I suck at shooting?

    I am not going to go into the whole mk1 v mx fight...

    I am also with Henry, if the community voted to remove it why is it a goal again? Whatever though.

  2. Just now, Ben Flint ッ said:

    Well just saying it's not the players fault, lol. shouldn't punish someone for doing something that is in the game.

    You shouldn't punish someone for doing something that is not an intended mechanism that would break the economy? hmmmmmmm ok

     

    To those who think the economy is already broken that is not the point of my post so you don't need to go off on your tangent again.

  3. 3 hours ago, BaDaBiNg_10-8 said:

    Hopefully it’s in a state where they actually prosecute and people get serious prison sentences. Where I’m at, we had a hit and run, vehicle versus pedestrian in a cross walk, driver was DUI (twice the legal limit) and the kid died. The driver took a plea deal and got five years in prison, but I’m sure he will get out in three on good conduct. DUi laws are fucking ridiculous. 

    Talking to Urban yesterday the guy is looking at 35+ years if convicted on all accounts. However, like you said, good behavior, ect. ect. Urban lives in Canada and I have no idea what the laws around DUI are in his providence. 

    BaDaBiNg_10-8, Sp0on and OMG-A-FISH like this
  4. Just now, Jay Davies said:

    That is a reasonable way to use trackers, Im just saying if I see a random ass boxtruck and its on the side of the road and the guy is fixing it and hes heading to mine, Probably should'nt throw a tracker on it, but they will anyway, And I don't call that reasonable suspicion

    If all he is doing is mining, what does he care if there is a tracker on his vehicle? If anything, should it get stolen, the cops will know exactly where it is.

    I get what you are saying though, a cop pulling someone over at Athira checkpoint and trackering them. You have no way of knowing if they are going to mine, or run coke.

  5. Just now, Jay Davies said:

    Ok, iv never seen someone on asylum say he’ll yea you can track my car! But I’m jut saying maybe put a small restriction on them.

    I really don't think that anyone would. If you want to put restrictions on when cops can put trackers on civs, then are civs still allowed to put trackers on cops whenever they want? If you do put restrictions on then how do you punish those who do it unjustly? How do you prove they actually have a tracker on your car? They could legitly just be repairing, or putting a tracker on then repairing, or repairing and canceling. Honestly, I don't really see a way to enforce any rules that would be made as proof would always be a very gray area unless they openly admitted it.

  6. Just now, Jay Davies said:

    no where in the world is a police force allowed to track a vehicle

    1

    California Code, Penal Code - PEN § 637.7

    (a) No person or entity in this state shall use an electronic tracking device to determine the location or movement of a person.

    (b) This section shall not apply when the registered owner, lessor, or lessee of a vehicle has consented to the use of the electronic tracking device with respect to that vehicle.

    (c) This section shall not apply to the lawful use of an electronic tracking device by a law enforcement agency.

    (d) As used in this section, “electronic tracking device” means any device attached to a vehicle or other movable thing that reveals its location or movement by the transmission of electronic signals.

    (e) A violation of this section is a misdemeanor.

    (f) A violation of this section by a person, business, firm, company, association, partnership, or corporation licensed under Division 3 (commencing with Section 5000) of the Business and Professions Code shall constitute grounds for revocation of the license issued to that person, business, firm, company, association, partnership, or corporation, pursuant to the provisions that provide for the revocation of the license as set forth in Division 3 (commencing with Section 5000) of the Business and Professions Code .

     

    That being said yes the code says lawful use. Honestly, I kinda feel like if a cop wants to waste 1k putting a tracker on a vehicle, let them. Personally, I will use them when I go into an illegal area and see a vehicle I know I can tracker before engaging. Or if I see a vehicle I think is going to be used for drug or weapon trafficking. 

    I feel I should clarify that lawful use by law enforcement in the penal code would mean something like an order from a judge.

    Patato likes this
  7. Just now, skimancole said:

    It’s a great idea but keep in mind this isn’t a whitelisted server so this “method” will be used for trolling in Kavala and people just towing off random cars :shrug:

    I am sure you could make it so that only cars marked to be towed can be towed.

    I like the idea as far as impounding goes. Some way for officers to vanish cars will unfortunately always be needed to stop the trolls from blocking spawn points.

    Seizing however.... it can be hard enough for the APD to secure an Ifrit for a minute as is. I would personally say leave seizing as is.

×
×
  • Create New...