Calle.

There would need to be a policy that officers must leave their plane for a Federal Event. I can remember one occurrence in the past where a UC was given a plane by a civ and he gave "callouts" for the entire bank. That amounted to 1 location every couple minutes. (I am basing it all on that one occurrence, so maybe that is a mistake ¯\_(ツ)_/¯) Other than that, I don't see much of an issue as long as planes abide by the heli manual.

Coin flips would be fuckin lit!!^^^^ Also turning in game currency into skins would definitely make people spend the money with no remorse lol

Honestly, I'd quit. I have a lot of time invested into the server, and I wouldn't be willing to start over.

So all the people without any good houses can vote yes!!!! 

Only real suggestion I have is to somehow tackle the massive inflation of money. People just have too much of it. You only really need a mil to be set for everything you need to play and things are all cheap (even 'end game' items like sui's, speedbombs, LMGs). Overall though at the end of the day Arma 3 is getting close to being a 10 year old game. Wiping the server occasionally isn't going to reinvent the wheel and bring loads of new players. I really appreciate and love all the content being added lately that keeps people who do play and have been long time players consistently coming back. I hope that instead of trying to beat a dead horse on Arma you choose to branch Asylum out into other games. You seem to have the talent to develop servers across games and the autistic community to dedicate time to it. Consider branching out Mitch

fuck that shit, this isn't tarkov. This would bury the server. Only reason I play is because of the progress I've made over the years + the money

I would quit honestly, especially if houses were wiped.  I like the fact that I can log on and have fun if I want to.  I have 14m and I still grind money from time to time but it's nice that I am not feeling forced to.

Why not just open another server with completely different database? Only reason people want a wipe is for houses. Just add a tax for owning houses so people who don't play will lose them faster.

well of course you'd be, with your infinite bank account.

a diff server ... plz no take my money

Second server different data but probably not a good idea to wipe the main server.

I love all of the admins voting yes like they will have to work for any of their money

Only issue with a wipe is it can literally  make or break the server. If this was like exile or dayz or some shit then it wouldnt be a big deal but with life mods its life or death. Asylum lost a shit tonne when they changed the money and reduced cap to 10mill and that was only money they touched, so bare that in mind.
 

Fuck all of you were not doing this

OML ... yes

+1111111111

Yes bring it back!!!!

On July 18 we will be conducting public testing of STRIFE between 3 PM and 7 PM EST. For those unaware, STRIFE is an Arma 3 game mode created by Paratus that was initially released in 2017 and later shut down. Its code has since been rewritten and the plan is to give it another go.
Currently the only map available is Malden, however adding support for Tanoa wouldn't take very long.
A test database will be used for these four hours of testing. This means that none of your Life progress is carried over, however normally your progress (primarily money) would be carried over.
From the initial 2017 announcement:
STRIFE is an extension of Asylum's Life, bringing your Life character into the ranks of the military in a full-scale war. Conquer the island of Tanoa Malden for amazing rewards on Altis and put your Life cash to good use in bringing down the enemy.
STRIFE is based on a front-line capture and finally brings all of Arma's assets to the hands of the Asylum community.
The 2017 trailer can be seen here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1rk6hK2zio
The goal of the game mode is to capture every objective on the map. There are two teams, OPFOR and BLUFOR, and each team starts the war with an equal amount of objectives owned. These objectives are terminals placed across the map which must be hacked. When a hack is started, the owner of the objective must regain control of the objective by restoring it, otherwise the objective will be lost to the hacking team after 10 minutes.

that still makes zero sense. You shoot back at someone shooting you and you don't get the kill so you report as RDM. but if you were able to kill them then you wouldn't report for RDM? no. if someone tries to RDM you and they kill you. Just report it, you get comped, they get banned, everyone wins. 

pov:career cop nigga

no

you need see some montage
and some tp is cheater

So let me get this straight.
He shoots at you. You consider that enough to return fire but failed to kill the person. So now you report for RDM. Had you of killed him, how could you still report that for RDM? Idk when you started playing here, but that's been a thing since i started in 2015. What could we do better with a situation like this?

Asylum stock market

All,
 
With the recent patch. I love the direction we're heading. My question to you..
With the recent updates, do you also agree with the direction we are heading?
Why, or why not?
What would you enjoy seeing in future updates and or the direction of this place. 
Comment below