Jump to content

LeagueLucian

Member
  • Posts

    32
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by LeagueLucian

  1. corona is not real so you are in luck
  2. only thing worse than the career cop freaks are the afd freaks now those kids need to get a grip
  3. @antho called me the nword in kavala

  4. just saying a good balance change would have clockwerk be the only captain able to do whatever he wants and all the others have to follow the rules really cut down on the bullshit no cap @captains
  5. Just copy and paste olympus blackwater
  6. Problem is afaik is that they are specifically targeting CEO of fed, a group spamming feds due to the fact it is the only content left on the server, with these policy updates. Or at least thats what I can gather from the recent posts. An ideal solution for this recent drama would be to have proper oversight positions. An example would be to make a Sheriff position, elected by the entire APD. A position like this could have the following responsibilities and requirements. Responsible for: Keeping the captains in check and reviews repercussions of policy updates (perhaps have a veto that can be overruled through going to mitch or something) Handling section F's discretely, making sure votes remain anonymous so Lts are more confident about a lack of retaliation if a vote fails Bringing forward rarely heard issues from the lower APD Etc Example qualifications Constable+ member of the APD who has been an active member for X amount of time Been a community member for X amount of time Relatively clean recent disciplinary history for X amount of time Passes a proficiency test on the APD guidebook Must not be a captain, senior medic or hold a staff position Benefits of a position such as this could be automatic X rank (ingame obviously no voting or IA perms if applicable), a payout in cash/prestige maybe And of course when I am at it equivalent civ rep positions would be great as well with regards to suggestions, updates, and changes on civ considering how badly received this patch was instead of the "development aids" who are afaik anonymous and not chosen at all by the community
  7. Who the fuck cares that lethaling gave someone a free pardon Its a game sorry people want to play. Besides, this is literally the only server than allows people to keep their bounty after respawning. I don't know who would want that at all. Absolutely horrible changes.
  8. Imagine @DS_Billy actually being right for once jesus christ I'll have whatever yall were smoking when you decided on this update. This is literally the dumbest shit I've ever read. Is this a April Fool's joke in July? I thought you guys had some idea guys or whatever. Get rid of them if these were their ideas. What the fuck is this changelog. What the fuck. Bounty Hunter is destroyed, removing lethals payout because the Chief of Police who got force retired wanted it, what the fuck are these patches. Goodbye server if this is what patches look like. Yikes says a lot when Sharing likes Billy's post oh my god
  9. Mitch is just trying to have some people who actually like him on the admin team
  10. Yep. Said it before that setting strict rules about what captains can do (1 gun drop per captain, can only test future policy updates as active captains/bend rules with civilian consent) would be way better than the current system. Obviously following the example guidelines I gave then captains still have more power but if they decide to, say, drive ifrits back to hq in combat repeatedly without a policy update then this is obvious abuse that goes beyond testing policies. Obviously not going to change however as mitch has his head up his ass making the server go to shit and no reasonable person would remove powers from themselves (the current captains).
  11. In my opinion promos were generally better handled with precincts. Now that everyone of differing ideologies is together it is harder to get promoted without going out of your way to kneepad. I know some cops who for a majority of their time on the APD have played with corporal+ and follow by their example perfectly and get feedback such as "being too toxic" or a need to improve guidebook knowledge. Idk about you but I feel that the higherups giving feedback should be ready with specific examples or its pretty shit feedback. Big +1. I don't care about "gamers" or "roleplayers" getting promoted, but it is pretty easy to tell that lower ranks generally take after their higher-ups. SWAT had the opportunity to have skilled players that the lower ranks could take after, and bring some of the heat off "useless" higher ups but that was ruined from the beginning by giving it to some of the most retarded people on the server. I also don't understand why people are so defensive about promoting skilled players who are good at combat when the sergeant application post specifically mentioned combat proficiency last time I read it. Yeah I don't understand how someone can be "Swat trained" and not know how to turn on combat stance. 99% of the time players are 10x better with combat stance on, especially when using armor. Just because there are over 1000 whitelisted cops doesn't mean at all that is the amount that play. Many people are whitelisted to constable and only play once every 3 months, as well as retired server staff or senior apd who have permanent ranks who probably don't have arma installed. Not really an APD issue, just an issue that happens when you give kids with 6 month old forums accounts who are irrelevant retards the ability to respond to comp requests. Retweet brother It would be sick if giving someone advanced feedback such as the number of votes they got without being specific about who voted what wasn't corruption. Or if the promotion process was at all standard instead of # of votes correlating to whatever was decided that month for promos. Real convenient if suddenly someone almost gets corp but the needed votes was higher that month, yeah? But sure lets give roblox cops and chief of police's high ranks. +1 Cops could have mk200s and still lose. For a majority of cops better equipment would not help but good tactics would be a massive improvement. Another missed opportunity for SWAT Pretty crazy how the captains can tell higher-ups to behave in a certain way because they are working on a policy update that no civilians know about when they aren't even on the server. The captains bending the rules is the most retarded thing I've ever heard. You could narrow it down a hell of a lot by just saying "active captains can bend the guidebook in order to test future policy updates, all captains can bend it with civilian consent, or all captains can drop 1 weapon for someone that is above their rank". Clears up bending the rules and gives them basically the same about of power but much easier to punish or determine if its abuse. Crazy
  12. 1. In-game alias?: Lucian Main xx2. Location (country or state) & Age : Canada, 163. How long have you played on the Asylum Servers?(Hours): 3kish4. Any previous gang affiliation? What gang(s)?: Tenacity, Temper, PPG, Acheron, Prime6. Have you ever been banned from The Asylum? (Explain.): Yeah I broke the rules7. How often do you play? (hours per day): 0 8. Tell us something about you. What can you bring to the team? Why should we accept you?: I can make fun of massi
  13. Intel simps in the thread bulldozer architecture was garbage but ryzen is great for games performs just as well in Arma
×
×
  • Create New...