Austin M

EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY
THIS IS A CLARIFICATION
Terrorism Charge and Definition per APD Guidebook:
Current Definition:
Applied when 3+ civilians assault a police HQ or government building (Does not apply to bank or fed). Due to the threat they pose, suspects may be sent straight to jail at officer discretion.
New Clarified Definition:
Applied when 3+ civilians assault a police HQ or government building in an aggressive manner (Does not apply to federal event locations).
This can include 3+ coordinated individuals, armed, aggressively attacking an HQ therefore causing Police Officer's to fear eminent harm
Coordinated from a cop perspective
Due to the threat they pose, suspects may be sent straight to jail at officer discretion.
 
If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact a Captain.
   - The Captains

I made 2 separate posts. Just get your prestige up like everyone else.

I made 2 separate posts. Just get your prestige up like everyone else.

Its lonely without you here. @Panda

This is all I need 🙂 
 
 

If I was getting pushed really hard by like 3 lgbtq ifrits it would just make me really horny. Great tactic

This is all I need 🙂 
 
 

@Innate, is this for you

@Innate

This is all I need 🙂 
 
 

Combat.Looks.Boring is it really just stand by bullet proof glass and quick peek the whole time?

Combat.Looks.Boring is it really just stand by bullet proof glass and quick peek the whole time?

Currently the development team is looking for some additional help. We are looking specifically for SQF Developers.
SQF Developers
Primary focus: Implementing new content & features Adding QoL improvements Bug fixes  
Position Requirements
General
Must be at least 18 years old at time of applying. Must be in a good standing, known, active within the community. Must have work examples or proof of knowledge for the position you are applying for. Must have the ability to understand the impact of new features on the entire server before adding them. Must not be completely brain-dead and have the ability to comprehend given tasks and ask semi-intelligent questions if help is required with your task. If I can find the answer on Google in 5 seconds... it's a stupid question Ability to use TeamSpeak as primary method of communication and Discord as a secondary. Ability to self improve based off of constructive criticism. SQF Developer
Adequate knowledge of: SQF Eden Editor GUI Altis Life framework At least some knowledge of version control systems such as git. Thick skin.  
Apply Here -> Select Dev/Design Application

One of those things are not like the others. Flashing down a house takes a lot more effort and with the price and effort it takes to do so. It stops officers from doing it when they arent supposed to.

My logic is that there is policy for it and some effort to execute it. Removing steps and making it easier for corporals to enter houses isnt wise. Currently its hard to do for constables-sergeant. You are risking a car full of flashbangs, meaning it isnt done often.

TLDR make it too easy itll get abused and removed anyways.

This will age well

I spoke with a captain a while back about the 1 minute procedure and how it probably should be removed. Since originally it was to be used back when you couldn’t send anyone to jail from anywhere. But it wasn’t taken out as he was fine with people using lethals on someone you couldn’t down restrain and ticket in the final minute.
 
As for how often cadets and constables read it. I’d hope you read it more. 
Gang fort used to be considered a turf until a group of individuals ruined that. Just one of those hindsight things.

It takes like 30 flashbangs to break a house, it sounds pretty fair to me.

In the absence of a Lt+ you may flashbang a house down if theyre a actively shooting barricaded suspect https://wiki.gaming-asylum.com/wiki/Raiding_Policies#Constable.2FCorporal.2FSergeant_Home_Entry

I’m only going to respond to a couple of these for now.
0. Afking in captains office is the same as hiding, it’s just the illusion of availability. Generally speaking if a corporal or below has a questions they can ask a sgt or Lt. If that sgt or lt doesn’t know, and they don’t see any captain on TeamSpeak it’s pretty easy to message one on discord. I’ve had no problem reaching out and getting one to respond.
3. I don’t think a restriction needs to be made. If officers are repeatedly hovering over rebels in a bid to get shot out. If the rebels kill the pilot it’s the rebel fault. If the rebels disable the heli then it’s on the pilot.
4. Marid is just useless, I’d say it’s less policy restriction and more how useful it is. Once it gets pulled it becomes a liability, front tire gets shot out then you can shoot the drivers leg. Then once you lose control all focus goes to it.
 
I have more opinions on the others but I’ll leave it at this for now.
Also, having 4 captains was/is dumb the point of 3 is to have a tie breaker. Having to rely on SAs to act as a tie breaker seems redundant.

I’m only going to respond to a couple of these for now.
0. Afking in captains office is the same as hiding, it’s just the illusion of availability. Generally speaking if a corporal or below has a questions they can ask a sgt or Lt. If that sgt or lt doesn’t know, and they don’t see any captain on TeamSpeak it’s pretty easy to message one on discord. I’ve had no problem reaching out and getting one to respond.
3. I don’t think a restriction needs to be made. If officers are repeatedly hovering over rebels in a bid to get shot out. If the rebels kill the pilot it’s the rebel fault. If the rebels disable the heli then it’s on the pilot.
4. Marid is just useless, I’d say it’s less policy restriction and more how useful it is. Once it gets pulled it becomes a liability, front tire gets shot out then you can shoot the drivers leg. Then once you lose control all focus goes to it.
 
I have more opinions on the others but I’ll leave it at this for now.
Also, having 4 captains was/is dumb the point of 3 is to have a tie breaker. Having to rely on SAs to act as a tie breaker seems redundant.

Not every idea is going to be a good idea. With the section F one, personally I could never see where it’d be used. Lts or captains would’ve heard about the issue before ever having the need to “section f” someone. 
 
As with this suggestion, I see what you’re trying to do. But adding another form of money I don’t think is the correct path. The only people that struggle with cash are the Higher ups anyhow. But that’s a convo for another day.

Not every idea is going to be a good idea. With the section F one, personally I could never see where it’d be used. Lts or captains would’ve heard about the issue before ever having the need to “section f” someone. 
 
As with this suggestion, I see what you’re trying to do. But adding another form of money I don’t think is the correct path. The only people that struggle with cash are the Higher ups anyhow. But that’s a convo for another day.

Not every idea is going to be a good idea. With the section F one, personally I could never see where it’d be used. Lts or captains would’ve heard about the issue before ever having the need to “section f” someone. 
 
As with this suggestion, I see what you’re trying to do. But adding another form of money I don’t think is the correct path. The only people that struggle with cash are the Higher ups anyhow. But that’s a convo for another day.

You would be the one to repeat a joke but only louder.