Make it to where if you have a bounty hunters license, you will not be involved in your current gang's wars. Gang wars should be about killing people, not downing and putting people in jail.
If you make this change, i guarentee more gangs would send more war invites. Seems like these days nobody wars each other anymore because they are scared of getting bounty hunted.
APD Van v1.0:
•Increased Van durability? Increased texture production!
•Fill her up with 12 cops to any backup call.
•Park her in Kavala Square and make all the new civs say ooo's and ahh's.
•Doubles as a prisoner transport for large scale busts.
Why is it when a gang is the focus of a grotty gangs video its not removed but when the APD gets under the spotlight shit hits the fan and people get salty?
To my many friends, both known and unknown, wherever you may be, I submit these thoughts for your consideration. As is customary for a letter of this sort, I will now offer up paper and ink anent the phylogeny of Mr. @Clint Beastwood's foul, morally questionable politics in order to make the point that bitterness seeps out of Clint like blood from an underdone ribeye steak. That extreme bitterness is, as far as I can tell, what leads him to redefine unbridled self-indulgence as a virtue, as the ultimate test of personal freedom.
Although the themes in Clint's blandishments are limited, Clint has a glib proficiency with words and very sensitive nostrils. He can smell money in your pocket from a block away. Once that delicious aroma reaches Clint's nostrils, he'll start talking about the joy of commercialism and how my bitterness at him is merely the latent projection of libidinal energy stemming from self-induced anguish. As you listen to Clint's sing-song, chances are you won't even notice his hand as it goes into your pocket. Only later, after you realize you've been robbed, will you truly understand that his ruderies are not pedantic treatises expressing theories or extravaganzas dealing in fables or fancies. They are substantial, sober outpourings from the very soul of collaborationism.
Our top priority in the upcoming weeks must be to reinvigorate our collective commitment to building and maintaining a sensitive, tolerant, and humane community. Look, of course that's going to be tough. Anybody who tells you it's going to be easy or that one can wave a magic wand and make it happen hasn't been paying attention to how Clint operates. Nevertheless, I've known a number of honorable people who have laid down their lives to fight for economic, social, and cultural justice. Without exception, these people understood deeply that Clint plans to foist the most poisonously false and destructive myths imaginable upon us in the blink of an eye. I'd like to see him try to get away with such a plan; that should be good for a laugh. You see, most people have already observed that Clint's deeds promote a redistribution of wealth. This is always an appealing proposition for Clint's servitors because much of the redistributed wealth will undoubtedly end up in the hands of the redistributors as a condign reward for their loyalty to Clint.
Clint's stentorian, incoherent expostulations have been used to feed us a diet of robbery, murder, violence, and all other manner of trials and tribulations. This is a sobering measure of their influence and extent. It also demonstrates how Clint's circulars can be subtle. They can be so subtle that many people never realize they're being influenced by them. That's why we must proactively notify humanity that it would be great if we could take steps toward creating an inclusive society free of attitudinal barriers. Still, if we take a step, just a step, towards addressing the issue of nonrepresentationalism, then maybe we can open people's eyes (including our own) to a vision of how to issue a call to conscience and reason. Clint believes that space gods arriving in flying saucers will save humanity from self-destruction. Go home, Clint; you're drunk. Any sober person would realize that Clint is an interesting character. On the one hand, he likes to compose paeans to fainéantism. But on the other hand, he keeps saying that his crafty, loud crime syndicate is a respected civil-rights organization. In such statements, as in most of his propaganda, there are major omissions and layers of codswallop wrapped around a small piece of the truth. The real story is that we should not concern ourselves with Clint's putative virtue or vice. Rather, we should concern ourselves with our own welfare and with the fact that Clint's incessant bloviating leads me to believe that Clint has taken it upon himself to feed on the politics of resentment, alienation, frustration, anger, and fear. Once we realize that, what do we do? The appropriate thing, in my judgment, is to get us out of the hammerlock in which Clint is holding us. I say that because his flock is a sterile bubble of diabolism. Everyone inside the bubble wants to replace our natural soul with an artificial one. In contrast, everyone outside the bubble agrees that the term “idiot savant” comes to mind when thinking of Clint. Admittedly, that term applies only halfway to him, which is why I myself insist that if Clint sincerely believes that his publicity stunts can give us deeper insights into the nature of reality then he must be smoking something illegal.
If five years ago I had described a person like Clint to you and told you that in five years he'd dissolve the bonds that join individuals to their natural communities, you'd have thought me ultra-infelicific. You'd have laughed at me and told me it couldn't happen. So it is useful now to note that, first, it has happened and, second, to try to understand how it happened and how no matter how bad you think his op-ed pieces are, I assure you that they are far, far worse than you think. When I'm through with him he'll think twice before attempting to toss sops to the egos of the hate-filled. While you or I might find it natural to want to establish liberté, egalité, fraternité, his goal is to create problems that our grandchildren will have to live with. This is abject alcoholism!
If we don't make an impartial and well-informed evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of Clint's canards, then Clint will soon become unstoppable. No borders will be able to detain him. No united global opinion will be able to isolate him. No international police or juridical institutions will be able to interdict him. Like a lion after tasting the blood of human victims, he will eviscerate freedom of speech and sexual privacy rights. So, Clint, maybe the problem is not with deplorable, psychotic hammerheads, but with you. I've met numerous frightened people who crave shelter from the gathering storm of Clint-induced extremism. To them I say, it seems clear that the quest to understand how Clint can be so doctrinaire raises far more questions than it answers. But we ought to look at the matter in a broader framework before we draw final conclusions on the subject: We see that Clint sees no reason why he shouldn't meddle in everyone else's affairs. It is only through an enlightened, outraged citizenry that such moral turpitude, corruption, and degradation of the law can be brought to a halt. So, let me enlighten and outrage you by stating that I support the way of willing exchange, of common consent, of self-responsibility, of open opportunity. Clint, in contrast, supports taking the focus off the real issues. This difference in what we each support indicates that we have a dilemma of leviathan proportions on our hands: Should we identify, challenge, defy, disrupt, and, finally, destroy the institutions that force us to tailor our smear tactics just to suit his hideous whims, or is it sufficient to indicate in a rough and approximate way the two destructive tendencies that I believe are the main driving force of modern adventurism? While that question may not be as profound as “What's the meaning of life?” or “Is there a God?”, Clint drops the names of famous people whenever possible. That makes him sound smarter than he really is and obscures the fact that I myself stand by what I've written before, that I allege we should knock down Clint's house of cards. By “house of cards,” I'm referring to the fragile, highly unstable, and beggarly framework of lies on which Clint's popularity is based. Without that framework, people everywhere would come to realize that Clint's apologues are not only uncontrollable but divisive. They are divisive at a time when we need unity. They are apolaustic at a time when we need to come together to tell our shared stories about how Clint has never been able to assimilate and accept the humane ideals, civilized aims, and social aspirations of his peers. In fact, I have said that to Clint on many occasions, and I will keep on saying it until he stops curing the evil of discrimination with more discrimination.
Just because Clint deems it morally acceptable to impair the practice of democracy doesn't make that right in the eyes of God. As people with a religious bent already know, Clint can fool some of the people all of the time. He can fool all of the people some of the time. But he can't fool all of the people all of the time. We indisputably can't afford to let him destroy everything beautiful and good. What I'm suggesting is that we tell him how wrong he is. That's the key to condemning Clint's criminal ineptitude, and it's the only way that most people will ever learn that he proclaims at every opportunity that he'd never encourage young people to break all the rules, cut themselves loose from their roots, and adopt a snooty lifestyle. The gentleman doth protest too much, methinks.
Some people apparently believe that if we don't bother Clint, Clint won't bother us. The fallacy of that belief is that our desires and his are not merely different; they are opposed in mortal enmity. Clint wants to defuse or undermine incisive critiques of his vilipensive behavior by turning them into procedural arguments about mechanisms of institutional restraint. We, in contrast, want to alert people that he likes to say that individual worth is defined by race, ethnicity, religion, or national origin. We can see the ruinous effects of this pernicious nonsense all around us every day. For example, we see censorious twits relabeling millions of people as “acerbic”. We see the most closed-minded purveyors of malice and hatred you'll ever see expressing doubt that I wish I knew when Clint was planning on unleashing his next volley of jealous reports. Alas, I'm no Nostradamus. Nevertheless, some of my predictions have come true in spades. For instance, I predicted ages ago that Clint would eat our nation to its bones, and look what happened. Even scarier, I predicted that Clint would see to it that all patriotic endeavors are directed down blind alleys where they end in frustration and discouragement. Although most people doubted that prediction when I made it, they neglected to consider that Clint recently went through a collectivism phase in which he tried repeatedly to impede every diplomatic, security, and social priority on which our government needs to focus its efforts. In fact, I'm not convinced that this phase of his has entirely passed. My evidence is that Clint and his despotism squad have been hard at work creating a one-world government combining fanaticism and oligarchism under the same tent, all under their control. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced that there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly coprophagous in intent. If this fatuous scheme is successful, you can wave goodbye to your freedom to say anything publicly about how courage is what we need to keep the faith—not politeness, not intellectual flair, not cleverness with words, just courage. And it sometimes takes a lot of courage to look a mumpish yokel in the eye and tell him that perusing the membership of Clint's faddism movement is like taking a tour of Dick Tracy's Rogue's Gallery, and everyone with half a brain understands that.
While Clint has a right, as do we all, to believe whatever he wants about McCarthyism, his factotums, who are legion, resist seeing that he is controlling and demanding. They resist seeing such things because to see them, to examine them, to think about them and draw conclusions from them is to plant markers that define the limits of what is abhorrent and what is not. I am not embarrassed to admit that I have neither the training, the experience, the license, nor the clinical setting necessary to properly take a proactive, rather than a reactive, stance. Nevertheless, I do have the will to show pluck and optimism when presented with threats and terror. That's why I surely assert that knowledge and wisdom are his enemies. Clint understands that by limiting education and enlightenment, he can fool more people into believing that he is a man of morality, achievements, and noble qualities, one who often sacrifices his own reputation or safety in order to pursue that which is right and those things that truly matter. Sadly, those with the least education are those who would benefit most from the knowledge that Clint's reportages have created a raffish universe devoid of logic and evidence. Only within this universe does it make sense to say that the moon is made of green cheese. Only within this universe does it make sense to rifle, pillage, plunder, and loot. And, only if we carve solutions that are neither tendentious nor hidebound can we destroy this blowsy universe of his and exemplify civility, kindness, empathy, and fairness.
Clint has already begun constructing gas chambers, incinerators, gulags, and concentration camps. I wish I were joking, but I'm not. What's more, Clint should think about how his flimflams lead uppity flakes to promote group-think attitudes over individual insights. If Clint doesn't want to think that hard, perhaps he should just keep quiet. Let me conclude by expressing the hope that by reading this letter you have learned the life lesson, “Always put an end to Mr. Clint Beastwood's diabolical cycle of prejudice and reprisal.”
IIRC added houses can't have storage work RELIABLY. ie the sheds added by old diamond Proc.
It should only affect loading of the mission file when the start up scripts are running. Continuous scripts shouldn't be needed for houses to stay in place. Donor drops frames because its got so much shit there (and probably a bunch of broken scripts that are remaining from donor level checks from previous perks prior to bohemia nuking donor perks). Adding houses is one line of code, however sometimes it breaks (ie donor). But thats speculation. Arma does what Arma wants regardless of common sense and what should happen.
But I have very little knowledge of Armas inner workings, especially pertaining to how Asylum is running its file (and its archaic framework), so don't quote me on anything.
Don't you think its just a bitt stupid that you can't run guns for like half the time? Even after the nerfs during day running guns is still better/safer than running coke.
Steve liked a post in a topic by Reapered in gang wars and bounty hunters
CoryB liked a post in a topic by Steve in Cartel? Rebel Outpost?
Crossfade liked a post in a topic by Steve in Cartel? Rebel Outpost?
bum41 liked a post in a topic by Steve in Cartel? Rebel Outpost?.thumb.jpg.6df799d2cde998bebf38aad153512733.jpg)
.thumb.jpg.90e5a54689a62908bf17cd730c55b259.jpg)
TRYHARD liked a post in a topic by Steve in Rotating Drug Fields/Processors Poll
Erron White liked a post in a topic by Steve in Rotating Drug Fields/Processors Poll
Flameless liked a post in a topic by Steve in Rotating Drug Fields/Processors Poll
Xehons liked a post in a topic by Steve in Rotating Drug Fields/Processors Poll.thumb.jpg.42b178e7e81b6b49adc4ddf98a844e27.jpg)
