.jpg.c6957cab2947ec0eaf2a9abc1a6579e7.jpg)
Mitch (IFRIT)
-
Posts
5,921 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Posts posted by Mitch (IFRIT)
-
-
Just now, abdul karim azeem said:
i fr been saying this ! ! !! !
https://www.gaming-asylum.com/forums/index.php?/forum/22-altis-life-discussion/
You can see how my previous inquiry went....
-
It would be awesome to see everyone fighting to get to the top again. I think this is a seriously under estimated game changer.
Actually JP, GamerGrill, Djmon and 15 others like this -
Cool idea. Finish what Identity couldn't.
MarchingBands, Kawaii, Sandwich and 11 others like this -
2 minutes ago, Kawaii said:
To add on, it could start with a limited run of shops available and then add on incrementally to see how the server does perhaps
that sounds like an easy solution to me too. But for any house we don't want "owned" it has to be done individually with each house. NPC shops is already going to be a nightmare for the devs to sift through im sure. I can't imagine the rest of the map..
-
2 minutes ago, 王 rando 王 said:
set up a public test server in which everyone has unlimited money, do multiple server messages on the main server telling people to join it, people who join it get a free 25k and a sneak peak at possible new houses. we'll have a decent amount of players on it easily.
yes that is an option. But more what's the max stress etc. I am picturing a full server with all the houses owned with all full inventories being accessed in different ways at different times. Essentially an environment that can really only be obtained on a live server that isn't being done just for testing. More to come on that
-
The issue that is currently being discussed is the hit to server performance. For the sake of explaining it here easily. It can be amounted to essentially doubling the amount of houses that need to be loaded by the server. It's unknown the performance hit it would take to do so. And it would be infuriating for many to buy the house and then have to loose it. And for those at max house cap, they had to sell one of their other houses to make room, and are now out the new house and their old house. IDK if there is a reliable way to test this in a test environment as it's pretty hard to replicate a full server, and all the loads and stresses that come along with it.
-
Just now, 王 rando 王 said:
I'm fine with this and I will admit I forgot about the godmode thing aswell. I'm just saying theres only a handful of different variants of purchasable houses, including these would drastically increase the volume of available houses.
I'd love to live above the Kavala gun store. But looks like that idea would have to be tabled.
iirc there were some other house types that were not able to be owned, other than the one you and potato showed. Am I thinking wrong?
-
Watching how the last casino went. Idk if I really want to see us go further down that road. At this time i don't want to see anything casino wise return in game. Should we feel the need to go down that path again. We will look to an external casino that utilizes the asylum currency.
王 rando 王 likes this -
At first I thought about living ontop of the store would be a cool idea. But the whole god mode etc proves to be a problem there.
Perhaps we could look at making a warning that these shop houses can be taken back for server features at anytime without warning, adding that they will be compensated at their market value. idk thinking of ideas to get this implemented. -
So if the price was adjusted to 15, instead of 25. The 10 people in this thread would agree with that price? And you'd make a purchase of that skin?
Bob Danaloo and abdul karim azeem like this -
On 5/3/2022 at 10:09 PM, KingOfNarniaa said:
great skins but fucking $25 per skin is way too much maybe like 10 or 15 and a bundle deal for all 3 for the price of 2
It would appear your original comment got lost in the other responses. I retract my original statement about your lack of constructive feedback. My apologies.
Would 15 per skin seem more reasonable?
-
12 hours ago, KingOfNarniaa said:
seems like you cant take any criticism everyone gave you exactly what you asked for everyones telling you $25 is way too much, people are giving you what they think is a fair price and ideas are being spoon fed to you not everyones going to suck your dick cause they're chasing admin or validation. dont ask for opinions and sugestions if you're gonna get upset when people disagree with you.
Weird. Its like I asked for constructive feedback. But per the usual. Memes and off handed comments were the usual response. You failed to even provide any feedback and would rather just roast my response.
Everyone is acting like 25 for a straight out decent skin is somehow breaking their world. I get its not free which everyone would obviously prefer.
I've said this time and time again. No one is going to advocate for them to make less money in game, and I've now learned that unless it's free they're going to be mad as well.
As mentioned above, more skins for less each makes a ton of sense which I completely agree with. However, we can't add endless skins to the server as we strive to keep the mission file size as low as possible. As each person who joins the server has to download it all from the same server, often at the same time. And a lagging server sucks for everyone. With that, I have to be selective of what we add with skins as they take the most space. And the ones we do add I can't offer for 2.99.
But you all get that complex right?
Another idea is we could do rotating skins? Like 30 day skins that you pay for. Fresh in and fresh out would solve the space issue. But I can't even imagine that people would want 30 day skins they gotta pay for. You tell me
-
They are available for purchase via MyAsylum
7 hours ago, Bully said:
Not true. But you do you and you know best.
-
7 minutes ago, Dillon said:
you asked for criticism and people are criticizing.
Perhaps you should re read my post 🤣
-
-
All,
As I have heard over the last few years. There is a desire from many who whish to support the server via buying skins but are not interested in dealing with crates. @Kelly made some awesome skins that I want to release in a future update that doesn't involve those pesky crates. I am posting it now to provide the opportunity for constructive feedback prior to release.
Below is a sneak peak of said skins. Each skin will cost 1,000 gold. They will soon be added in a future hotfix.
-
53 minutes ago, Bandit said:
don't get banned lol
Yes, solid choice. There really isn't a way to tie in the RCON to a timer on the server for getting banned. As far as the server cares, you are either banned or you're not.
Bandit's recommendation would be your best bet.
-
4 hours ago, Austin M said:
With my login bonus being no more, I thought of a great money grab. Just sell login bonus savers.
I assume this probably violates Bohemia COC....
indeed would violate it
-
3 minutes ago, jeans said:
Na. I was at a swap meet this weekend. Always wanted an asylum sticker for my truck. Walked past a sticker guy and he printed me a few on the spot and goes, "I can put it on a shirt for $20" and I could not resist.
lol that's awesome. We used to run a swag store. Stickers would have been a cool idea too
jeans likes this -
5 hours ago, jeans said:
lol I wear sleeves when I'm in the sun so my hands end up being a few shades more ethnic
Was it a few years ago that you got that?!
-
16 minutes ago, Michael L said:
Region lock is not happening, the Chinas donate a lot and are already region locked from other servers so they come here = more income for asylum. Would be a stupid business decision to kick them out, unless everyone calling for a region lock is willing to cover the loss?
It's not about money in the slightest. I see connection complaints from a ton of regions. Brazil, China, Australia, Germany, Croatia, etc etc. I don't think denying connections is a smart move for server health in 2022. I wish there was a solution, but we can't survive as a NA arma server. We also can only have the box in one location.
-
2 minutes ago, DinKleberg said:
We're giving you feedback aren't we ? This server is full of trolls so did you expect anything less in theses replies?
Like I said. They can watch from the sidelines.
-
Man you guys sure cry hard. Fucking Sally's. Shut the fuck up and play the game you paid for 6 years ago.
You cry babies are the reason no one wants to do work for anyone. You're all riding slicks dick about the content he put out. But you seem to have zero idea how much he hated the constant bitching you guys do here.
If you can't find a way to at least be constructive, don't be surprised when I bop you from forums and game. You can watch from the sidelines for all I care.
-
15 minutes ago, Sheriff Rick said:
The leaks surrounding the next Arma is that it is a Arma 'lite' with just two modes and not nearly as modifiable as Arma 3. Let's not get our hopes up. Sounds like the new game engine has been in development hell imo
I wouldn't put a ton of weight behind that rumor. The ability to mod and customize the game has become a huge reason why it's still alive to this day. I doubt that Tencent would agree with BI knee capping the future potential of the game and any following series. They may not be a majority holder, but they still have a financial interest.
But yes. I have SUPER SECRET INFO ON ARMA 4. Like, subscribe and stay tuned where I release it in a future podcast.
Thanks to my sponsor
House Vendor Upgrade
in Denied
Posted
Perhaps we can see if there is a non broken way to introduce accessing the exchange from your house. There are some obvious exploit vectors that would need to be first addressed before this idea could make it to production.